This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I don't know why Noah's birth date is being constantly removed. Twitter can be used as a source, and currently used on several bio pages. I don't get why all of a sudden there is an issue. If it is removed again, please discuss it here. If his Twitter isn't good, then would this site be acceptable? [1] I realize this site is a blog: [2], but the article has pictures of his 15th birthday on the iCarly set, implying it's May 3, 1996.
Tinton5 ( talk) 02:53, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
His birthday is confirmed on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/noahBmunck?sk=info — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.253.10.144 ( talk) 03:11, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Can we mention that he has appeared in several ads, including for TruGreen? https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/trugreen-brings-back-popular-neighborhood-lawn-kid-in-new-national-marketing-campaign-to-launch-tree-and-shrub-service-117066973.html https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna42337941 149.19.40.233 ( talk) 16:23, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
@ Magical Golden Whip Please stop with the unwarranted undoing of my revisions to the article. Your claims that my edits are "disruptive" are incorrect. My sources are within the Wikipedia guidelines:
"Never use self-published sources—including but not limited to books, zines, websites, blogs, and social network posts—as sources of material about a living person, unless written or published by the subject of the article." - Everything I have used was indeed published by the subject.
"Primary sources that have been reputably published may be used in Wikipedia, but only with care, because it is easy to misuse them." - They are being used with care as they are the only possible sources to use, no secondary sources exist for my edits or else of course I would use those instead.
"A primary source may be used on Wikipedia only to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the primary source but without further, specialized knowledge. For example, an article about a musician may cite discographies and track listings published by the record label, and an article about a novel may cite passages to describe the plot, but any interpretation needs a secondary source." - All of my edits fall under this statement.
Not only that, but user @ Dan arndt already added a warning message on primary/unreliable sources, which is more than enough without undoing all of the important up-to-date information I have fixed. I have changed any YouTube/Spotify links to Soundcloud links, as the Soundcloud page is officially verified as Munck. That was what you complained about. I'm not sure why you reverted again with the only comment being "still no" - that is very unbecoming.
Please do not revert the page entirely again. It is unnecessary and stubborn. Other users have made the same complaints on your profile. Use the Talk page on this article, or make your own adjustments instead of just undoing work. Thank you. Brutallust ( talk) 04:05, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I don't know why Noah's birth date is being constantly removed. Twitter can be used as a source, and currently used on several bio pages. I don't get why all of a sudden there is an issue. If it is removed again, please discuss it here. If his Twitter isn't good, then would this site be acceptable? [1] I realize this site is a blog: [2], but the article has pictures of his 15th birthday on the iCarly set, implying it's May 3, 1996.
Tinton5 ( talk) 02:53, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
His birthday is confirmed on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/noahBmunck?sk=info — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.253.10.144 ( talk) 03:11, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Can we mention that he has appeared in several ads, including for TruGreen? https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/trugreen-brings-back-popular-neighborhood-lawn-kid-in-new-national-marketing-campaign-to-launch-tree-and-shrub-service-117066973.html https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna42337941 149.19.40.233 ( talk) 16:23, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
@ Magical Golden Whip Please stop with the unwarranted undoing of my revisions to the article. Your claims that my edits are "disruptive" are incorrect. My sources are within the Wikipedia guidelines:
"Never use self-published sources—including but not limited to books, zines, websites, blogs, and social network posts—as sources of material about a living person, unless written or published by the subject of the article." - Everything I have used was indeed published by the subject.
"Primary sources that have been reputably published may be used in Wikipedia, but only with care, because it is easy to misuse them." - They are being used with care as they are the only possible sources to use, no secondary sources exist for my edits or else of course I would use those instead.
"A primary source may be used on Wikipedia only to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the primary source but without further, specialized knowledge. For example, an article about a musician may cite discographies and track listings published by the record label, and an article about a novel may cite passages to describe the plot, but any interpretation needs a secondary source." - All of my edits fall under this statement.
Not only that, but user @ Dan arndt already added a warning message on primary/unreliable sources, which is more than enough without undoing all of the important up-to-date information I have fixed. I have changed any YouTube/Spotify links to Soundcloud links, as the Soundcloud page is officially verified as Munck. That was what you complained about. I'm not sure why you reverted again with the only comment being "still no" - that is very unbecoming.
Please do not revert the page entirely again. It is unnecessary and stubborn. Other users have made the same complaints on your profile. Use the Talk page on this article, or make your own adjustments instead of just undoing work. Thank you. Brutallust ( talk) 04:05, 26 February 2024 (UTC)