![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Perhaps someone could explain this better. NINA loans are defined by their very acronym as targeting borrowers with "no income and no assets". So if there's no income involved, the entire Income requirements subsection makes no sense at all. What gives?
Confused, -- Erik Anderson 21:29, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
I don't know when it was coined but it was not as stated in the article. See this quotation from Realty Times, dated June 14, 2007: "The shift is an indication that investor's appetite for risk has diminished. The allure of the 'NINJA' loan products (no income, no job, no assets) has run its course as they are no longer producing the kinds of returns they previously had," said Ted Faravelli, a San Jose, CA-based expert witness, forensic real estate analyst and managing director for the California Association of Real Estate Appraisers.
Clearly the term had been in use well before this date in mid 2007. DCDuring ( talk) 19:16, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Oh NOO! They have a lot of qualities: High disstress-tolerance, optimism, peacefulness, modesty - short: All those qualities of the american pioneers ... So I believe: With this selfmendacious term and thinking of "NINA == very low quality-peoples" a whole nation exhausts her future by undermining her peace and forcing a bleedy (communist, LOL) revolution in way of arrogance of the (way toooo well being! and mostly very morbid) "elites" - we know this repetitive history since Babylon, Greek, Rome, Inkas, Azthekes, Russian "Communists" - so , the US-Americans and the British Commonwealth could be the next example in this old, boring story/history - an ecyclopedy should know a little more than such banalities ... hella
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on No Income No Asset. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 05:57, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Perhaps someone could explain this better. NINA loans are defined by their very acronym as targeting borrowers with "no income and no assets". So if there's no income involved, the entire Income requirements subsection makes no sense at all. What gives?
Confused, -- Erik Anderson 21:29, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
I don't know when it was coined but it was not as stated in the article. See this quotation from Realty Times, dated June 14, 2007: "The shift is an indication that investor's appetite for risk has diminished. The allure of the 'NINJA' loan products (no income, no job, no assets) has run its course as they are no longer producing the kinds of returns they previously had," said Ted Faravelli, a San Jose, CA-based expert witness, forensic real estate analyst and managing director for the California Association of Real Estate Appraisers.
Clearly the term had been in use well before this date in mid 2007. DCDuring ( talk) 19:16, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Oh NOO! They have a lot of qualities: High disstress-tolerance, optimism, peacefulness, modesty - short: All those qualities of the american pioneers ... So I believe: With this selfmendacious term and thinking of "NINA == very low quality-peoples" a whole nation exhausts her future by undermining her peace and forcing a bleedy (communist, LOL) revolution in way of arrogance of the (way toooo well being! and mostly very morbid) "elites" - we know this repetitive history since Babylon, Greek, Rome, Inkas, Azthekes, Russian "Communists" - so , the US-Americans and the British Commonwealth could be the next example in this old, boring story/history - an ecyclopedy should know a little more than such banalities ... hella
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on No Income No Asset. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 05:57, 1 April 2016 (UTC)