This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
No Nut November article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
It is requested that an image or photograph of No Nut November be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Sources, from a quick Google search:
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/news/article.cfm?c_id=6&objectid=12165497
https://noisey.vice.com/en_us/article/pa5bmz/jill-scott-is-trying-to-dismantle-no-nut-november
https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/7755160/no-nut-november-women-not-happy/
https://www.popbuzz.com/internet/viral/what-is-no-nut-november-tweets-memes/
https://metro.co.uk/2018/11/14/what-is-no-nut-november-8137643/
http://www.mndaily.com/article/2018/11/o-haasch-millenial-pandering-works-so-long-as-its-authentic
https://uproxx.com/life/no-nut-november-superpowers/
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/no-nut-november-masturbation_us_5a0b29ede4b0bc648a0e42d5
Benjamin ( talk) 22:34, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Following declined CSD of the above article it was proposed to merge the above page into this page. I would agree to this merge until such time as some WP:RS refers to Destroy Dick December facilitating a stand alone article. @ Twistedaxe and Espresso Addict: JW 1961 Talk 21:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
I'm curious, but is there a suitable image that would be appropriate for No Nut November? I don't think there's an internet culture image that plays a role in centering NNN activities, but hopefully there is something out there that can represent No Nut November in some way shape or form. Qwertyxp2000 ( talk | contribs) 04:03, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
@ BSC-56: @ Materialscientist: The information was impartial and I personally don't see a problem with it. BSC-56, the impression I'm getting is you don't like it but that isn't really a valid reason for removing it. NemesisAT ( talk) 13:59, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
According to WP:YESPOV:
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The History mentioned here is not gives complete histroy of No Nut November if you can link to https://blockerx.net/blog/history-of-no-nut-november/ every one get complete knowledge about no nut november Chandraprabhudev ( talk) 12:20, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Destroy Dick December is a joke. No one is seriously proposing people do this, and the sources referenced seem kinda tongue-in-cheek. Can someone delete the bit about Destroy Dick December, make it shorter, or at least make it clear that it's a joke? TropicalTriangle ( talk) 18:10, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
If you look up "No Fap November" you'll find a popular entry on urban dictionary from 2009. Worth adding to the article since it was known as No Fap November for a lot longer than it's been known as No Nut November. 216.10.179.161 ( talk) 18:17, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
In § History, it currently reads "Although No Nut November was originally intended to be satirical, some participants suggest that abstaining from ejaculating and watching pornography has health benefits.
1
2" (emphasis mine)
The word suggest implies that this is a simple idea that someone should consider doing, which may or may not be true; one doesn't take it very seriously; it's just a suggestion; etc. However, the two citations clearly say that NNN is affiliated with NoFap, a group genuinely believing that abstinence from masturbation increases testosterone, greater focus, concentration and other extraordinary, exaggerated claims without any proof. This is why the NoFap article contains a WP:DS notice on pseudoscience/fringe science. The excessive citations at Masturbation#Benefits show that scientific consensus (which we should follow per WP:FRINGE) is in favor of masturbation, which is why I think we should use the word claim instead.
The article has used the word claim in place of suggest for a long time until recently, where it was first
changed to say by @
Reflecktor:,
got reverted by me, and finally
changed to suggest by the same user. As per my edit summary, claim is used to "call [someone's] statement's credibility into question, by emphasizing any potential contradiction or implying disregard for evidence
" (
MOS:CLAIM). The word claim also does a better job contextually and stylistically as a contrast to the first clause IMO. ~~
lol1
VNIO (I made a mistake?
talk to me)
22:11, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Destroy Dick December and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 18#Destroy Dick December until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219 Talk Contribs 14:19, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
No Nut November is a largely whimsical Internet meme challenge. The article spends nearly all of the History section discussing NoFap and the far-right, while the article has very little explaining that the challenge is usually seen as an ironic meme challenge. Reading the article gives the general impression that No Nut November is an auxiliary to NoFap or associated with the far-right. Though some background is informative, the challenge is first and foremost an Internet meme challenge. This should reflected in the article's overall presentation. TomeTwister ( talk) 12:22, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
whimsicaltone then you should present them. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 21:07, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
It’s just like destroy dick December 2600:4040:516C:9F00:4DF3:E84C:4E70:709C ( talk) 12:35, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
We should update the official subreddit numbers, and add the official website, https://nnn-progress.vercel.app/ . The official subreddit has been running for the past 5 years, and now has 155k users. The wikipedia page cites 52,000 subscribers, which undermines the size of the movement. The website also has 1000 MAU, and is tightly engrained with the movent. It should be included as one of the parts of No Nut November. Dhillonjustin99 ( talk) 03:54, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
No Nut November article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
It is requested that an image or photograph of No Nut November be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Sources, from a quick Google search:
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/news/article.cfm?c_id=6&objectid=12165497
https://noisey.vice.com/en_us/article/pa5bmz/jill-scott-is-trying-to-dismantle-no-nut-november
https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/7755160/no-nut-november-women-not-happy/
https://www.popbuzz.com/internet/viral/what-is-no-nut-november-tweets-memes/
https://metro.co.uk/2018/11/14/what-is-no-nut-november-8137643/
http://www.mndaily.com/article/2018/11/o-haasch-millenial-pandering-works-so-long-as-its-authentic
https://uproxx.com/life/no-nut-november-superpowers/
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/no-nut-november-masturbation_us_5a0b29ede4b0bc648a0e42d5
Benjamin ( talk) 22:34, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Following declined CSD of the above article it was proposed to merge the above page into this page. I would agree to this merge until such time as some WP:RS refers to Destroy Dick December facilitating a stand alone article. @ Twistedaxe and Espresso Addict: JW 1961 Talk 21:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
I'm curious, but is there a suitable image that would be appropriate for No Nut November? I don't think there's an internet culture image that plays a role in centering NNN activities, but hopefully there is something out there that can represent No Nut November in some way shape or form. Qwertyxp2000 ( talk | contribs) 04:03, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
@ BSC-56: @ Materialscientist: The information was impartial and I personally don't see a problem with it. BSC-56, the impression I'm getting is you don't like it but that isn't really a valid reason for removing it. NemesisAT ( talk) 13:59, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
According to WP:YESPOV:
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The History mentioned here is not gives complete histroy of No Nut November if you can link to https://blockerx.net/blog/history-of-no-nut-november/ every one get complete knowledge about no nut november Chandraprabhudev ( talk) 12:20, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Destroy Dick December is a joke. No one is seriously proposing people do this, and the sources referenced seem kinda tongue-in-cheek. Can someone delete the bit about Destroy Dick December, make it shorter, or at least make it clear that it's a joke? TropicalTriangle ( talk) 18:10, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
If you look up "No Fap November" you'll find a popular entry on urban dictionary from 2009. Worth adding to the article since it was known as No Fap November for a lot longer than it's been known as No Nut November. 216.10.179.161 ( talk) 18:17, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
In § History, it currently reads "Although No Nut November was originally intended to be satirical, some participants suggest that abstaining from ejaculating and watching pornography has health benefits.
1
2" (emphasis mine)
The word suggest implies that this is a simple idea that someone should consider doing, which may or may not be true; one doesn't take it very seriously; it's just a suggestion; etc. However, the two citations clearly say that NNN is affiliated with NoFap, a group genuinely believing that abstinence from masturbation increases testosterone, greater focus, concentration and other extraordinary, exaggerated claims without any proof. This is why the NoFap article contains a WP:DS notice on pseudoscience/fringe science. The excessive citations at Masturbation#Benefits show that scientific consensus (which we should follow per WP:FRINGE) is in favor of masturbation, which is why I think we should use the word claim instead.
The article has used the word claim in place of suggest for a long time until recently, where it was first
changed to say by @
Reflecktor:,
got reverted by me, and finally
changed to suggest by the same user. As per my edit summary, claim is used to "call [someone's] statement's credibility into question, by emphasizing any potential contradiction or implying disregard for evidence
" (
MOS:CLAIM). The word claim also does a better job contextually and stylistically as a contrast to the first clause IMO. ~~
lol1
VNIO (I made a mistake?
talk to me)
22:11, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Destroy Dick December and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 18#Destroy Dick December until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219 Talk Contribs 14:19, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
No Nut November is a largely whimsical Internet meme challenge. The article spends nearly all of the History section discussing NoFap and the far-right, while the article has very little explaining that the challenge is usually seen as an ironic meme challenge. Reading the article gives the general impression that No Nut November is an auxiliary to NoFap or associated with the far-right. Though some background is informative, the challenge is first and foremost an Internet meme challenge. This should reflected in the article's overall presentation. TomeTwister ( talk) 12:22, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
whimsicaltone then you should present them. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 21:07, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
It’s just like destroy dick December 2600:4040:516C:9F00:4DF3:E84C:4E70:709C ( talk) 12:35, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
We should update the official subreddit numbers, and add the official website, https://nnn-progress.vercel.app/ . The official subreddit has been running for the past 5 years, and now has 155k users. The wikipedia page cites 52,000 subscribers, which undermines the size of the movement. The website also has 1000 MAU, and is tightly engrained with the movent. It should be included as one of the parts of No Nut November. Dhillonjustin99 ( talk) 03:54, 10 November 2023 (UTC)