No. 78 Squadron RAAF has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
January 6, 2013. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
No. 78 Squadron RAAF took part in the last major air battle between the
Royal Australian Air Force and Japanese air units during
World War II? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Ian Rose ( talk · contribs) 01:59, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
How can I say no? ;-) Should be able to get to it in the next day or two... Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 01:59, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Review:
No issues with dup, dab or external links.
Structure, referencing, detail, neutrality and image licensing all okay.
Couple of minor points re. inforbox:
I copyedited for prose so check you're happy with all that, otherwise I think we're about done. Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 07:47, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
No. 78 Squadron RAAF has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
January 6, 2013. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
No. 78 Squadron RAAF took part in the last major air battle between the
Royal Australian Air Force and Japanese air units during
World War II? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Ian Rose ( talk · contribs) 01:59, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
How can I say no? ;-) Should be able to get to it in the next day or two... Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 01:59, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Review:
No issues with dup, dab or external links.
Structure, referencing, detail, neutrality and image licensing all okay.
Couple of minor points re. inforbox:
I copyedited for prose so check you're happy with all that, otherwise I think we're about done. Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 07:47, 23 January 2013 (UTC)