No. 75 Wing RAAF has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 14, 2016. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
No. 75 Wing RAAF article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from No. 75 Wing RAAF appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 26 July 2016 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Zawed ( talk · contribs) 06:54, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
I will review this one, comments to follow in due course. Zawed ( talk) 06:54, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
OK, having reviewed this, it looks in good shape. Three things:
Hope that is useful, I'll check back in a few days. Cheers. Zawed ( talk) 10:41, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
No. 75 Wing RAAF has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 14, 2016. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
No. 75 Wing RAAF article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from No. 75 Wing RAAF appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 26 July 2016 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Zawed ( talk · contribs) 06:54, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
I will review this one, comments to follow in due course. Zawed ( talk) 06:54, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
OK, having reviewed this, it looks in good shape. Three things:
Hope that is useful, I'll check back in a few days. Cheers. Zawed ( talk) 10:41, 5 July 2016 (UTC)