Home
•
Search
•
Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
<
Talk:Njörðr
GA Review
GA
review
(see
here
for criteria)
It is
reasonably well written
.
a
(prose)
:
b
(
MoS
)
:
It is
factually accurate
and
verifiable
.
a
(references)
:
b
(citations to
reliable sources
)
:
c
(
OR
)
:
It is
broad in its coverage
.
a
(major aspects)
:
b
(focused)
:
It follows the
neutral point of view
policy
.
Fair representation without bias
:
It is
stable
.
No edit wars etc.
:
It is illustrated by
images
, where possible and appropriate.
a
(images are tagged and non-free images have
fair use rationales
)
:
b
(appropriate use with
suitable captions
)
:
Overall
:
Pass/Fail
:
Pass. Nothing much to comment on—seems a thorough good article.
Arsenikk
(talk)
15:57, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
reply
Great, thanks!
:bloodofox:
(
talk
) 16:43, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
<
Talk:Njörðr
GA Review
GA
review
(see
here
for criteria)
It is
reasonably well written
.
a
(prose)
:
b
(
MoS
)
:
It is
factually accurate
and
verifiable
.
a
(references)
:
b
(citations to
reliable sources
)
:
c
(
OR
)
:
It is
broad in its coverage
.
a
(major aspects)
:
b
(focused)
:
It follows the
neutral point of view
policy
.
Fair representation without bias
:
It is
stable
.
No edit wars etc.
:
It is illustrated by
images
, where possible and appropriate.
a
(images are tagged and non-free images have
fair use rationales
)
:
b
(appropriate use with
suitable captions
)
:
Overall
:
Pass/Fail
:
Pass. Nothing much to comment on—seems a thorough good article.
Arsenikk
(talk)
15:57, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
reply
Great, thanks!
:bloodofox:
(
talk
) 16:43, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
reply
Videos
Youtube
|
Vimeo
|
Bing
Websites
Google
|
Yahoo
|
Bing
Encyclopedia
Google
|
Yahoo
|
Bing
Facebook
Top Of Page
Home
•
Search
•
Translate
©
CSE