This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has been questioned on the basis of lack of notability.
At the time the article was posted, there was little known about the nix package manager. I wish I had kept a track of where I ran into a reference which led me to this package manager, which now has its own domain, http://nixos.org/
I want to support the notability of this article. ( Ricgal ( talk) 02:06, 4 January 2009 (UTC))
Hello there, Gonzo_fan2007 referred me to you as I would also support the notability of this article, I first heard about nix from here. Let me know how else I can help. Kupojsin ( talk) 08:52, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
I added reliable secondary sources and removed the Notability template. — HowardBGolden ( talk) 22:50, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
User:Kugao placed an advert tag on this article. This section is to discuss his and others' (if any) concerns about this and help revise the article as necessary to be appropriate for Wikipedia. — HowardBGolden ( talk) 18:28, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Is the debian criticism link to make the Debian developer look ridiculous? The arguments against nix show an astonishing lack of understanding of it, together with an angry reaction of someone that felt offended. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.89.61.89 ( talk) 15:19, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
This article should probably be renamed to Nix (package manager). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.40.48.159 ( talk) 02:56, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
there's a non-primary-sources-needed tag on a statement that the authors consider the rust port not ready for prime time. It seems to be that a primary source is a reasonable way to cite the opinion of the primary source's author. Or is there something I don't understand? Albertanyone ( talk) 19:43, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has been questioned on the basis of lack of notability.
At the time the article was posted, there was little known about the nix package manager. I wish I had kept a track of where I ran into a reference which led me to this package manager, which now has its own domain, http://nixos.org/
I want to support the notability of this article. ( Ricgal ( talk) 02:06, 4 January 2009 (UTC))
Hello there, Gonzo_fan2007 referred me to you as I would also support the notability of this article, I first heard about nix from here. Let me know how else I can help. Kupojsin ( talk) 08:52, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
I added reliable secondary sources and removed the Notability template. — HowardBGolden ( talk) 22:50, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
User:Kugao placed an advert tag on this article. This section is to discuss his and others' (if any) concerns about this and help revise the article as necessary to be appropriate for Wikipedia. — HowardBGolden ( talk) 18:28, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Is the debian criticism link to make the Debian developer look ridiculous? The arguments against nix show an astonishing lack of understanding of it, together with an angry reaction of someone that felt offended. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.89.61.89 ( talk) 15:19, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
This article should probably be renamed to Nix (package manager). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.40.48.159 ( talk) 02:56, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
there's a non-primary-sources-needed tag on a statement that the authors consider the rust port not ready for prime time. It seems to be that a primary source is a reasonable way to cite the opinion of the primary source's author. Or is there something I don't understand? Albertanyone ( talk) 19:43, 25 May 2024 (UTC)