![]() | Ninth European Parliament was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (October 29, 2019). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
What is your oppinion on divison of the political groups on position/commission-coalition and opposition. EPP, PES (S&D) and ALDE (RE) were expected to vote for Von der Leyen as commission president, those three parties got "EU top jobs" which were previously divided only among EPP and PES politicians, because those two parties formed grand coalition in the past parliaments (now they lost majority). So, EPP, PES and ALDE in coalition/position and other parties/groups in opposition. Pis from ECR and M5S (NI) voted for Von der Leyen as well, but I wouldnt put ECR in coalition, maybe those two parties as supporting parties. Coalition is not official, European Parliament does not use those terms I think, but de-facto there is coalition and opposition in the EP, so maybe we can use it, and add "unoffical" if thats better. Your oppinions? Sredina ( talk) 13:59, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
Just flagging, the EP infographic in the sourced states the numbers used in the top total EP statistics section (435 new, 295 from last term and 16 who served in a previous term, with the five unaccounted MEPs presumably the five current vacancies). However the statistics chart by member states adds up to 447 new members. The unfinished breakdown by political group counts 346 new MEPs, with figures for G/EFA and NI not known. Identifying which members have been over-counted is somewhat difficult, but would be nice to bring everything into alignment if someone has time to figure it out. Therequiembellishere ( talk) 01:39, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
I would like to hear your opinion, with arguments, on this topic. Should the portfolio of High Rep be "Foreign Affairs and Security Policy" or simply "High Representative of the Union". Portfolio is referod to as High Rep by the European Parliament, while actual portoflio names are used for all other commissioners (look: [1]). Every member of the Commission, even Vice-Presidents hold the title of the European Commissioner. The only exceptions are the President and High Rep, they are not having the title of the European Commissioner. So that's why I think, the portfolio title for High Rep should be "High Representative of the Union". It is clear what that is, since there is only one High Rep. Sredina ( talk) 13:41, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Therequiembellishere stop reverting and adding incorrect informations to the page. Your source is not a relevant source for this kind of things. You can discuss the topic here and we can find the solution. Sredina ( talk) 18:01, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Fiamh ( talk · contribs) 01:49, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
This article has failed its Good article nomination. This is how the article, as of October 29, 2019, compares against the six good article criteria:
When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.— Fiamh ( talk, contribs) 01:49, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi, currently the Standing committees table is messed up and I cannot understand how to fix it up. Anyone knows what's wrong and/or has the time to fix it? -- Ritchie92 ( talk) 13:45, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
I've just come across this article and see some issue that could be addressed. I see (to my amazement) that one editor made a good article nomination. I wonder if there is anyone out there who would like to;
The issues I see with the page currently are;
It does feel very appropriate that an article written
about an EU institution has the same criticism as material
often produced by European Institutions!!
Please reach out in reply here on on my
talk page if this is something that would be of interest to take part in.
Jo Jc Jo
Talk💬
Edits📝
19:21, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
For those interested in this I would love to coordinate with you. I already made a draft with proposed changes and would love to coordinate via the talk page. I think it's important this gets done, especially with the new elections for the Parliament coming up. Chefs-kiss ( talk) 16:31, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Itemized list for each of the changes and reasoning. Happy to discuss and rollback some of them.
Note: This clean up does not address sources. I do intend to work further on this article, maybe in the future this can be resubmitted to the GA review process
1. Leadership Section
2. Political groups and parties
3. Members
4. Working bodies
5. Composition of the Executive
6. Council presidency
7. Appointments
8. Statistics
9. Delegations
10. 2019 elections results
Chefs-kiss ( talk) 18:35, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Do you have an email or a discord? Maybe it can be quicker for main communicationediting WP is not something between the two of us. Any decision on the major structure of this article has to be made on this talk page, not in a private conversation between two editors. Yakme ( talk) 09:27, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
![]() | Ninth European Parliament was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (October 29, 2019). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
What is your oppinion on divison of the political groups on position/commission-coalition and opposition. EPP, PES (S&D) and ALDE (RE) were expected to vote for Von der Leyen as commission president, those three parties got "EU top jobs" which were previously divided only among EPP and PES politicians, because those two parties formed grand coalition in the past parliaments (now they lost majority). So, EPP, PES and ALDE in coalition/position and other parties/groups in opposition. Pis from ECR and M5S (NI) voted for Von der Leyen as well, but I wouldnt put ECR in coalition, maybe those two parties as supporting parties. Coalition is not official, European Parliament does not use those terms I think, but de-facto there is coalition and opposition in the EP, so maybe we can use it, and add "unoffical" if thats better. Your oppinions? Sredina ( talk) 13:59, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
Just flagging, the EP infographic in the sourced states the numbers used in the top total EP statistics section (435 new, 295 from last term and 16 who served in a previous term, with the five unaccounted MEPs presumably the five current vacancies). However the statistics chart by member states adds up to 447 new members. The unfinished breakdown by political group counts 346 new MEPs, with figures for G/EFA and NI not known. Identifying which members have been over-counted is somewhat difficult, but would be nice to bring everything into alignment if someone has time to figure it out. Therequiembellishere ( talk) 01:39, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
I would like to hear your opinion, with arguments, on this topic. Should the portfolio of High Rep be "Foreign Affairs and Security Policy" or simply "High Representative of the Union". Portfolio is referod to as High Rep by the European Parliament, while actual portoflio names are used for all other commissioners (look: [1]). Every member of the Commission, even Vice-Presidents hold the title of the European Commissioner. The only exceptions are the President and High Rep, they are not having the title of the European Commissioner. So that's why I think, the portfolio title for High Rep should be "High Representative of the Union". It is clear what that is, since there is only one High Rep. Sredina ( talk) 13:41, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Therequiembellishere stop reverting and adding incorrect informations to the page. Your source is not a relevant source for this kind of things. You can discuss the topic here and we can find the solution. Sredina ( talk) 18:01, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Fiamh ( talk · contribs) 01:49, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
This article has failed its Good article nomination. This is how the article, as of October 29, 2019, compares against the six good article criteria:
When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.— Fiamh ( talk, contribs) 01:49, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi, currently the Standing committees table is messed up and I cannot understand how to fix it up. Anyone knows what's wrong and/or has the time to fix it? -- Ritchie92 ( talk) 13:45, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
I've just come across this article and see some issue that could be addressed. I see (to my amazement) that one editor made a good article nomination. I wonder if there is anyone out there who would like to;
The issues I see with the page currently are;
It does feel very appropriate that an article written
about an EU institution has the same criticism as material
often produced by European Institutions!!
Please reach out in reply here on on my
talk page if this is something that would be of interest to take part in.
Jo Jc Jo
Talk💬
Edits📝
19:21, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
For those interested in this I would love to coordinate with you. I already made a draft with proposed changes and would love to coordinate via the talk page. I think it's important this gets done, especially with the new elections for the Parliament coming up. Chefs-kiss ( talk) 16:31, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Itemized list for each of the changes and reasoning. Happy to discuss and rollback some of them.
Note: This clean up does not address sources. I do intend to work further on this article, maybe in the future this can be resubmitted to the GA review process
1. Leadership Section
2. Political groups and parties
3. Members
4. Working bodies
5. Composition of the Executive
6. Council presidency
7. Appointments
8. Statistics
9. Delegations
10. 2019 elections results
Chefs-kiss ( talk) 18:35, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Do you have an email or a discord? Maybe it can be quicker for main communicationediting WP is not something between the two of us. Any decision on the major structure of this article has to be made on this talk page, not in a private conversation between two editors. Yakme ( talk) 09:27, 29 March 2023 (UTC)