This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Nikki Grahame article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Nikki Grahame is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
It is requested that a photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Why the revert? To my recollection, all I did was fix the grammatical errors. Treybien 1:31, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 23:07, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Has anyone more information on the new Channel 4 documentary? 2.70.228.77 ( talk) 19:53, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
CC-BY-SA declaration: I've removed the following paragraph from the article because it is off-topic for the subject. I'm leaving it here in case its removal breaks any citations.
An ICSTIS regulator commented most of complaining viewers believed the makers of Big Brother misled them; they were under the impression they had voted to permanently evict the ex-housemate permanently. [1] In the wake of this, ICSTIS launched an inquiry which could have resulted in Channel 4 refunding an estimated £3 million to people who took part with phone or text votes. [1] Despite ICSTIS ruling that Big Brother breached its guidelines and misled phone voters, Channel 4 was not made to refund viewers and was instead fined and forced to pay almost £50,000 in administrative costs. [2]
Baffle☿gab 03:39, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Nikki Grahame article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Nikki Grahame is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
It is requested that a photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Why the revert? To my recollection, all I did was fix the grammatical errors. Treybien 1:31, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 23:07, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Has anyone more information on the new Channel 4 documentary? 2.70.228.77 ( talk) 19:53, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
CC-BY-SA declaration: I've removed the following paragraph from the article because it is off-topic for the subject. I'm leaving it here in case its removal breaks any citations.
An ICSTIS regulator commented most of complaining viewers believed the makers of Big Brother misled them; they were under the impression they had voted to permanently evict the ex-housemate permanently. [1] In the wake of this, ICSTIS launched an inquiry which could have resulted in Channel 4 refunding an estimated £3 million to people who took part with phone or text votes. [1] Despite ICSTIS ruling that Big Brother breached its guidelines and misled phone voters, Channel 4 was not made to refund viewers and was instead fined and forced to pay almost £50,000 in administrative costs. [2]
Baffle☿gab 03:39, 17 September 2021 (UTC)