GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Pyrotec ( talk) 07:40, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
By now I've read the article through once and it appears to be at or about GA-level, but I've not checked all the citations.
I'm now going to work my way through the article section by section, but leaving the WP:Lead until last. I may fix "minor" problems as I go, but if I don't I will list them here. This may take another day or so. Pyrotec ( talk) 20:24, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
Sorry for the delay, I'll try and get this review finished. Pyrotec ( talk) 12:52, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
At this point, there are a few minor fixes needed on a few of the citations so I'm putting the review On Hold. Pyrotec ( talk) 15:40, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
ref subbed. Any other citation fixes needed? Serendi pod ous 16:38, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
An informative, well referenced article on this topic of "forthcoming doom, or not, depending on your point of view".
I'm awarding this article GA status. Congratulations on bringing the article up to GA standard. Pyrotec ( talk) 10:53, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Pyrotec ( talk) 07:40, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
By now I've read the article through once and it appears to be at or about GA-level, but I've not checked all the citations.
I'm now going to work my way through the article section by section, but leaving the WP:Lead until last. I may fix "minor" problems as I go, but if I don't I will list them here. This may take another day or so. Pyrotec ( talk) 20:24, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
Sorry for the delay, I'll try and get this review finished. Pyrotec ( talk) 12:52, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
At this point, there are a few minor fixes needed on a few of the citations so I'm putting the review On Hold. Pyrotec ( talk) 15:40, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
ref subbed. Any other citation fixes needed? Serendi pod ous 16:38, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
An informative, well referenced article on this topic of "forthcoming doom, or not, depending on your point of view".
I'm awarding this article GA status. Congratulations on bringing the article up to GA standard. Pyrotec ( talk) 10:53, 7 August 2011 (UTC)