Ngwa people has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: November 17, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Ngwa people article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in Nigerian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realize, travelled, centre) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
A fact from Ngwa people appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 15 December 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Vanderwaalforces ( talk · contribs) 14:55, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
I will definitely love to review this! -- Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 14:55, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
Normally, the lead section should summarise the main points of the article and provide context for the topic. It should also comply with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections.
The current lead section is too short and does not mention some important aspects of the Ngwa people, such as their history, culture, religion, and economy. It also does not explain what the Ngwa clan is and how it relates to the Ngwa people.
Please, expanding the lead section to include more information and references from the article body. -- Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 18:27, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
The history section should provide a comprehensive and chronological overview of the Ngwa people’s history, from their origin to the present day. It should also cite reliable sources to verify the information and avoid original research or biased claims.
The current history section is too brief and incomplete, and does not cover some significant events and periods in the Ngwa people's history, such as their migration from Umunoha, their involvement in the slave trade and the Aro wars, their resistance to British colonialism, their role in the Nigerian Civil War, and their post-independence development and challenges. It also lacks citations and references to support the statements. Please, add more details and sources to the history section, and divide it into subsections for clarity and organisation. Divide into subsections Origin and migration, Slave trade and Aro wars, Colonial era and Nigerian Civil War.-- Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 18:39, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Can you add useful links to this section. The see also section is supposed to contain only existing Wikipedia articles/lists and not redlinks per "The "See also" section should not include red links" at WP:SEEALSO. Or better, remove the section entirely as it is not required. Intentional ping @ Reading Beans:.
The result was: promoted by
Bruxton
talk
00:08, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
And yet, my research has shown that the Ngwa, the largest clan in Igboland, possess complex traditions which are invaluable for reconstructing their oral history.
Improved to Good Article status by Reading Beans ( talk). Self-nominated at 22:49, 20 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Ngwa people; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: Good article, Reading Beans. This is your fourth DYK nomination, so you can submit one more without needing a QPQ. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 22:34, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Ngwa people has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: November 17, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Ngwa people article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in Nigerian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realize, travelled, centre) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
A fact from Ngwa people appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 15 December 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Vanderwaalforces ( talk · contribs) 14:55, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
I will definitely love to review this! -- Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 14:55, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
Normally, the lead section should summarise the main points of the article and provide context for the topic. It should also comply with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections.
The current lead section is too short and does not mention some important aspects of the Ngwa people, such as their history, culture, religion, and economy. It also does not explain what the Ngwa clan is and how it relates to the Ngwa people.
Please, expanding the lead section to include more information and references from the article body. -- Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 18:27, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
The history section should provide a comprehensive and chronological overview of the Ngwa people’s history, from their origin to the present day. It should also cite reliable sources to verify the information and avoid original research or biased claims.
The current history section is too brief and incomplete, and does not cover some significant events and periods in the Ngwa people's history, such as their migration from Umunoha, their involvement in the slave trade and the Aro wars, their resistance to British colonialism, their role in the Nigerian Civil War, and their post-independence development and challenges. It also lacks citations and references to support the statements. Please, add more details and sources to the history section, and divide it into subsections for clarity and organisation. Divide into subsections Origin and migration, Slave trade and Aro wars, Colonial era and Nigerian Civil War.-- Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 18:39, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Can you add useful links to this section. The see also section is supposed to contain only existing Wikipedia articles/lists and not redlinks per "The "See also" section should not include red links" at WP:SEEALSO. Or better, remove the section entirely as it is not required. Intentional ping @ Reading Beans:.
The result was: promoted by
Bruxton
talk
00:08, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
And yet, my research has shown that the Ngwa, the largest clan in Igboland, possess complex traditions which are invaluable for reconstructing their oral history.
Improved to Good Article status by Reading Beans ( talk). Self-nominated at 22:49, 20 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Ngwa people; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: Good article, Reading Beans. This is your fourth DYK nomination, so you can submit one more without needing a QPQ. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 22:34, 22 November 2023 (UTC)