![]() | This
edit request to
Nexus 6P has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please remove "Nexus 6P scores very low in the durability test. The display can be cracked easily and the device can be bent without much force.[12]" The linked source contains updated information that clarifies, why the original durability test is methodologically wrong. Ondra.nekola ( talk) 19:37, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
The sentence "The device chassis was susceptible to bending under pressure, such as when carried tightly in a user's pocket." should be removed. The linked references do not support this claim. The YouTube video, which is the source for all three references, shows someone explicitly trying, with maximum force applied, to bend the phone. This is not the same as bending "when carried in a user's pocket". Also, as is visible on the linked YouTube channel, all phones he has tested this way so far, do in fact bend. So the fact that the 6P does too is not noteworthy to specify as a "known issue". WikiJoop ( talk) 11:39, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Nexus 6P has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add Nexus M1 (codenamed Marlin) as the successor of the Nexus 6P, as it already exists in the Geekbench. 139.195.29.37 ( talk) 14:31, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
There is no Nexus 4P, and the article describing it is obviously misleading. Frantisek.nesveda ( talk) 08:37, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
The page was missing a supported CA Band Combo for the North American version: B4+B12. This is documented on the relevant FCC filing but there is no way to directly link to it for a citation. This page shows all filings for the Nexus 6P and the CA combos are listed under "RF Exposure Report", page 14. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tchaika ( talk • contribs) 14:53, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Nexus 6P has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please remove "Nexus 6P scores very low in the durability test. The display can be cracked easily and the device can be bent without much force.[12]" The linked source contains updated information that clarifies, why the original durability test is methodologically wrong. Ondra.nekola ( talk) 19:37, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
The sentence "The device chassis was susceptible to bending under pressure, such as when carried tightly in a user's pocket." should be removed. The linked references do not support this claim. The YouTube video, which is the source for all three references, shows someone explicitly trying, with maximum force applied, to bend the phone. This is not the same as bending "when carried in a user's pocket". Also, as is visible on the linked YouTube channel, all phones he has tested this way so far, do in fact bend. So the fact that the 6P does too is not noteworthy to specify as a "known issue". WikiJoop ( talk) 11:39, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Nexus 6P has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add Nexus M1 (codenamed Marlin) as the successor of the Nexus 6P, as it already exists in the Geekbench. 139.195.29.37 ( talk) 14:31, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
There is no Nexus 4P, and the article describing it is obviously misleading. Frantisek.nesveda ( talk) 08:37, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
The page was missing a supported CA Band Combo for the North American version: B4+B12. This is documented on the relevant FCC filing but there is no way to directly link to it for a citation. This page shows all filings for the Nexus 6P and the CA combos are listed under "RF Exposure Report", page 14. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tchaika ( talk • contribs) 14:53, 25 October 2016 (UTC)