This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
News leak article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Just a quickie comment for now: yes, it's clearly nonsensical and counter-productive to have three separate articles on what is fundamentally the same subject. I'm not even sure there is a counter-argument to be made. Cgingold 18:58, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Internet leaks are news leaks that occur on the internet. We don't have an article for phone leak, letter leak, meeting-in-a-pub leak - we don't need a separate article for internet leak. Comments, anyone, before I merge them? -- HughCharlesParker ( talk - contribs) 09:52, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
See Talk:Andrew J. May. Several of us have searched and can find no evidence for this other than Clay's claim, apparently based on Lockwood's papers. Rees11 ( talk) 19:06, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Maybe we should try to find a better example, one that's verifiable? Maybe the Pentagon Papers? Rees11 ( talk) 20:46, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Can someone please explain to me why the edition of this example of a news leak keeps getting reverted:
Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by N1111z ( talk • contribs) 10:40, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
This should not be on this page. It was only added to defame the person in question. Comey's memos were embargoed by Comey until a which point they were released by his permission. A leak can't come from a person who creates the embargo it just gets "released". Also your source provides no information on considering the memo's release as a leak. BSeverywhere ( talk) 11:14, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
References
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
News leak article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Just a quickie comment for now: yes, it's clearly nonsensical and counter-productive to have three separate articles on what is fundamentally the same subject. I'm not even sure there is a counter-argument to be made. Cgingold 18:58, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Internet leaks are news leaks that occur on the internet. We don't have an article for phone leak, letter leak, meeting-in-a-pub leak - we don't need a separate article for internet leak. Comments, anyone, before I merge them? -- HughCharlesParker ( talk - contribs) 09:52, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
See Talk:Andrew J. May. Several of us have searched and can find no evidence for this other than Clay's claim, apparently based on Lockwood's papers. Rees11 ( talk) 19:06, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Maybe we should try to find a better example, one that's verifiable? Maybe the Pentagon Papers? Rees11 ( talk) 20:46, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Can someone please explain to me why the edition of this example of a news leak keeps getting reverted:
Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by N1111z ( talk • contribs) 10:40, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
This should not be on this page. It was only added to defame the person in question. Comey's memos were embargoed by Comey until a which point they were released by his permission. A leak can't come from a person who creates the embargo it just gets "released". Also your source provides no information on considering the memo's release as a leak. BSeverywhere ( talk) 11:14, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
References