This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Done No need to be torn about people adding restaurants (and POV about them), local or not, to articles--99% of the time they should not be included. Katr67 ( talk) 18:31, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
OK, please, pretty please read about our neutral point of view, specifically about what we call undue weight. We do not double the size of an article by adding one incident over the 150 year history of the community. Nor do we give it its own section. Nor do we use it as a soapbox about beavers. If you want to discuss the cons to beaver removal in general, as was done here as shown by the use of sources that have no mention of Newberg in them, then see about adding that removal information to the page about beavers. Not here. If you want to add some history about the city, I'm sure the coming of the railroad was far more important, or the coming of the highway, and there seems to be no info on either. Aboutmovies ( talk) 08:00, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Newberg, Oregon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:52, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Done No need to be torn about people adding restaurants (and POV about them), local or not, to articles--99% of the time they should not be included. Katr67 ( talk) 18:31, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
OK, please, pretty please read about our neutral point of view, specifically about what we call undue weight. We do not double the size of an article by adding one incident over the 150 year history of the community. Nor do we give it its own section. Nor do we use it as a soapbox about beavers. If you want to discuss the cons to beaver removal in general, as was done here as shown by the use of sources that have no mention of Newberg in them, then see about adding that removal information to the page about beavers. Not here. If you want to add some history about the city, I'm sure the coming of the railroad was far more important, or the coming of the highway, and there seems to be no info on either. Aboutmovies ( talk) 08:00, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Newberg, Oregon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:52, 17 February 2018 (UTC)