This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Newbattle Viaduct article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Could someone who understands such things 'sort out' the imperial/metric conversion of the arch lengths, please? The article has 44 feet (13 m) and 43 feet 10 inches (13.36 m), as 44 feet is more than 43 feet 10 inches, the metric equivalent must be greater, too! 44ft = 13.41m; the shorter length converts correctly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:3018:8A00:4F9:6C81:D527:AFA5 ( talk) 21:47, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Newbattle Viaduct article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Could someone who understands such things 'sort out' the imperial/metric conversion of the arch lengths, please? The article has 44 feet (13 m) and 43 feet 10 inches (13.36 m), as 44 feet is more than 43 feet 10 inches, the metric equivalent must be greater, too! 44ft = 13.41m; the shorter length converts correctly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:3018:8A00:4F9:6C81:D527:AFA5 ( talk) 21:47, 9 December 2017 (UTC)