This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A route map (possible showing what was built or acquired when) would be much more useful than a list of stations. -- Piledhigheranddeeper ( talk) 21:55, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on New York and New England Railroad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:46, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
In section "Combined routes from Providence and Boston: 1863-1898," 3rd para., "Norwich and Worcester Railroad" is hyperlinked. Clicking on it just jumps you, annoyingly, to the top of the present article. Getteth it don't-eth I.
Jimlue ( talk) 04:54, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
@ Mackensen and Trainsandotherthings: I want to start a discussion on how to divide up the NYN&NE mainlines and corporate names. As we work towards getting the main NY&NE article to GA/FA status, it will be necessary to focus it on the corporate history and the larger scale operations, plus a higher-level description of the geography. The branchlines can all be given their own articles, with history and station listings there, and just a list of branchlines on the NY&NE article. The mainlines (Hopewell Junction–Brewster–Danbury–Waterbury–Hartford–Willimantic–Plainfield–Providence and Willimantic–Putnam–Southbridge–Blackstone–Franklin–Readville–Boston) are trickier. I think there's two main options:
My preference at the moment is for the sectional articles. I think that makes it easier to provide a start-to-finish history for each section. The BH&E and the HP&F were relatively short lived, so it makes more sense to discuss them in a combined context. It's not clear how much coherent history the two mainlines actually need; other than a few through services like the Nutmeg and White Train, they pretty quickly went back to being operated as smaller segments. (Nutmeg could probably be a catchall article for all the Boston–Hartford/Waterbury intercity services.) However, either method would be better than the current article, which has high-level corporate history and low-level detail mashed together. Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 20:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A route map (possible showing what was built or acquired when) would be much more useful than a list of stations. -- Piledhigheranddeeper ( talk) 21:55, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on New York and New England Railroad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:46, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
In section "Combined routes from Providence and Boston: 1863-1898," 3rd para., "Norwich and Worcester Railroad" is hyperlinked. Clicking on it just jumps you, annoyingly, to the top of the present article. Getteth it don't-eth I.
Jimlue ( talk) 04:54, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
@ Mackensen and Trainsandotherthings: I want to start a discussion on how to divide up the NYN&NE mainlines and corporate names. As we work towards getting the main NY&NE article to GA/FA status, it will be necessary to focus it on the corporate history and the larger scale operations, plus a higher-level description of the geography. The branchlines can all be given their own articles, with history and station listings there, and just a list of branchlines on the NY&NE article. The mainlines (Hopewell Junction–Brewster–Danbury–Waterbury–Hartford–Willimantic–Plainfield–Providence and Willimantic–Putnam–Southbridge–Blackstone–Franklin–Readville–Boston) are trickier. I think there's two main options:
My preference at the moment is for the sectional articles. I think that makes it easier to provide a start-to-finish history for each section. The BH&E and the HP&F were relatively short lived, so it makes more sense to discuss them in a combined context. It's not clear how much coherent history the two mainlines actually need; other than a few through services like the Nutmeg and White Train, they pretty quickly went back to being operated as smaller segments. (Nutmeg could probably be a catchall article for all the Boston–Hartford/Waterbury intercity services.) However, either method would be better than the current article, which has high-level corporate history and low-level detail mashed together. Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 20:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)