This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of New Topographics be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in New York (state) may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
I wrote this from my own rather hazy and incomplete knowledge of this photographic movement. If anyone who reads this, who knows anything about the subject, thinks that it is a good description, please remove the cleanup-verify tag. If you think the article is missing important information, which I think not unlikely, please add it. Thanks! Jeff Medkeff | Talk 14:42, Jan 31, 2005 (UTC)
Best, BC ( Bchalifour ( talk) 00:08, 24 December 2007 (UTC))
the description seems fine to me, but I question the title ... it's never referred to as "new topography," in my experience, but rather as "new topographics." don't know if this can be changed without breaking links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.237.64.82 ( talk • contribs) 21:13, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
The article claims Frank Gohlke used "24 cm × 24 cm – close enough to 8”×10”" - 24x24 isn't that close to 8x10, it's more like 10x10 or more accurately 9.5x9.5 inches. Could someone check the size of his prints and amend accordingly? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Notnearlythere ( talk • contribs) 08:04, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Some discussion of the book should be included, given that its significance is more than that of a mere catalogue. TerryToogood ( talk) 22:52, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of New Topographics be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in New York (state) may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
I wrote this from my own rather hazy and incomplete knowledge of this photographic movement. If anyone who reads this, who knows anything about the subject, thinks that it is a good description, please remove the cleanup-verify tag. If you think the article is missing important information, which I think not unlikely, please add it. Thanks! Jeff Medkeff | Talk 14:42, Jan 31, 2005 (UTC)
Best, BC ( Bchalifour ( talk) 00:08, 24 December 2007 (UTC))
the description seems fine to me, but I question the title ... it's never referred to as "new topography," in my experience, but rather as "new topographics." don't know if this can be changed without breaking links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.237.64.82 ( talk • contribs) 21:13, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
The article claims Frank Gohlke used "24 cm × 24 cm – close enough to 8”×10”" - 24x24 isn't that close to 8x10, it's more like 10x10 or more accurately 9.5x9.5 inches. Could someone check the size of his prints and amend accordingly? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Notnearlythere ( talk • contribs) 08:04, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Some discussion of the book should be included, given that its significance is more than that of a mere catalogue. TerryToogood ( talk) 22:52, 2 November 2015 (UTC)