This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics: Political parties This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Political parties task force. France This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Socialism This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Green Politics ( inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Green Politics, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Green PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject Green PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Green PoliticsGreen Politics articles

Section sizes Section size for New Popular Front (24 sections) Section name Byte count Section total (Top) 5,392 5,392 Background 1,175 1,175 History 14 18,646 Formation 7,986 7,986 2024 French legislative election 10,646 10,646 Members 198 32,046 Political parties 27,182 27,182 Trade unions 1,195 1,195 Organisations 2,236 2,236 External support 1,235 1,235 Election results 23 505 National Assembly 482 482 Political platform 4,295 11,379 Constitutional policy 808 808 Economic policy 2,409 2,409 Education policy 792 792 Foreign policy 2,258 2,258 Immigration 347 347 Social policy 470 470 Reactions 16 10,784 From the left 3,807 3,807 From centrists and others 6,961 6,961 Notes 26 26 References 525 525 Total 80,478 80,478

This article contains a translation of Nouveau Front Populaire from fr.wikipedia.

@ Braganza @ Number 57 @ Helper201 @ Checco @ Direct700 @ davide king There seems to be mixed signals as to whether the party has joined the coalition. Despite being named on the document, Raphael Glucksmann has indicated that his party won't be in a coalition tat consists of LFI. To which I ask, what is the current status of the party in this coalition? Do we leave it as is, with it being in the coalition, or do we remove it from the page? ValenciaThunderbolt ( talk) 21:16, 11 June 2024 (UTC) reply

I'm currently of the opinion to remove it presently, and perhaps add a sentence about it under the New Popular Front#Political parties for now, and only re-add it if its certainly joined up (as of now it seems like their are signs that it's both a member from the LFI source, and not a member according to Glucksmann himself, rather odd) Bejakyo ( talk) 23:50, 11 June 2024 (UTC) reply

I think Background is the better place for this Braganza ( talk) 05:09, 12 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Just want to let you know Place Publique has been confirmed as being a part of The New Popular Front. Glucksmann aslo told this morning (French time) he's backing the alliance. 78.114.160.168 ( talk) 08:17, 14 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Should we follow the French article and rename it the Popular Front (France, 2024)? Rogl94 ( talk) 16:44, 12 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Moot now with the release of their logo and the French article also reverting back to "Nouveau Front populaire". Rogl94 ( talk) 08:43, 14 June 2024 (UTC) reply

I see Cap21 listed as a member of the alliance. The sourced used say that. It says that cap21 call for an union between left, center and ecologist forces ("un grand rassemblement de toutes les forces politiques de gauche, du centre et écologistes") but the same text also strongly criticizes "les extrêmes", including the "far-left" (LFI). If you browses Corinne LePage's twitter, cap21's president, you can also see recent tweets showing she's against LFI. So cap21 should be removed. So I think cap21 should be removed from this page. 78.114.160.168 ( talk) 10:16, 14 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Same with regards to the PRG, and in fact neither Cap21 nor the PRG are included on the French page. Lanaerys ( talk) 16:24, 14 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Regarding the PRG, it depends. In some departments they're supporting NPF candidates. In others they don't. Two articles (FR) attesting that:

https://www.estrepublicain.fr/elections/2024/06/14/dans-le-doubs-le-parti-radical-de-gauche-soutient-le-nouveau-front-populaire

https://www.ladepeche.fr/2024/06/15/legislatives-2024-en-tarn-et-garonne-le-rn-et-lfi-sont-des-dangers-pour-la-democratie-assume-stephane-gonzalez-president-du-prg-12017462.php 78.114.160.168 ( talk) 16:33, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Should they be removed? WP:NFLISTS discourages use of fair use files when a corresponding article exists, which seems to be the case for most logos listed here. My edit was reverted but it did not address the reason on why I removed it, just stating that the logos do not exist locally. -- Min☠︎rax^{«¦ talk¦»} 02:04, 23 June 2024 (UTC) reply

I strongly believe that the article should be moved back to the previous title per WP:COMMONNAME: the name is a direct reference to the Popular Front of the 1930s and as such most English-language sources use the name "New Popular Front" and not "New People's Front." 24.19.232.205 ( talk) 08:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC) reply

The § History section needs a proper introduction to place the NPF in context of several precursor left parties and alliances, and should start with Leon Blum's Popular Front ( Front populaire). It should probably include such groups as the the Plural Left ( Gauche Plurielle) the Left Front (Front de Gauche), and NUPES (New Ecological and Social People's Union; fr:Nupes). Mathglot ( talk) 02:42, 8 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Maybe I'm just splitting hairs here, but the way I see it, " collective leadership" means that there's a formal, legal agreement that divides and shares responsibilities amongst several people. From this article, though, I get the impression that it's more like the NFP simply does not have a leader, and its constituent parties are left to promote themselves. Which is why there's some uneasiness and tension over who their PM candidate is or would be, and so on (I would think that in a collective leadership situation, they would have answers for this power-sharing). Am I mistaken here? If so, perhaps there should be more written in the article explaining the specifics of the leadership arrangement. If not, and "collective leadership" is a bit far, maybe we should just leave the leader field (in the infobox) empty? — Kawnhr ( talk) 23:54, 10 July 2024 (UTC) reply

What do you mean by "a formal, legal agreement"? The only place in the collective leadership article I see the word "agreement" is the one example for the Green Party of England and Wales. 174.92.25.207 ( talk) 04:37, 11 July 2024 (UTC) reply

In the sense that their leadership situation is written down in a party/alliance's founding documents or statutes, or other things of that nature. For example, the SDP–Liberal Alliance agreed to a joint leadership (weirdly not on its own page, but Social Democratic Party (UK)#The Alliance has "joint", as does this external source); Québec solidaire has a section outlining how the party's constitution breaks up leadership responsibilities amongst several positions. These are not perfect analogues, no, but the point is that there was an agreed-upon leadership structure… and I'm left wondering if the NFP has anything similar, or their agreement stopped at co-ordinating candidates to not compete with one another. — Kawnhr ( talk) 17:05, 11 July 2024 (UTC) reply