This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
New pop article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 23 December 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from New Pop to New pop. The result of the discussion was moved. |
The result of the move request was: Uncontroversial Move, despite being contested, this is unopposed for 2 weeks and a relisting. (non-admin closure) — Andy W. ( talk · ctb) 17:39, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
New Music (style) → New Pop – The article used to state that "New Music" and "New Pop" were synonymous. After checking the sources, I found that it was a confabulation, and that they are only "roughly equivalent". New Music does not appear to be a style. It is an umbrella term created for artists within the sectors of New Pop, New Romantic, new wave, and post-punk. Even if the terms were synonymous, "New Pop" would be a more logical, natural disambiguation. – Ilovetopaint ( talk) 10:25, 30 May 2016 (UTC) -- Relisting. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 11:42, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on New Pop. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:35, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky ( talk) 15:25, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
New Pop → New pop – Lowercase per MOS:MUSICCAPS and MOS:CAPS. "New pop" is not consistently capitalized in reliable secondary sources, eg this Pitchfork source used in the article. Popcornfud ( talk) 15:54, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
New pop article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 23 December 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from New Pop to New pop. The result of the discussion was moved. |
The result of the move request was: Uncontroversial Move, despite being contested, this is unopposed for 2 weeks and a relisting. (non-admin closure) — Andy W. ( talk · ctb) 17:39, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
New Music (style) → New Pop – The article used to state that "New Music" and "New Pop" were synonymous. After checking the sources, I found that it was a confabulation, and that they are only "roughly equivalent". New Music does not appear to be a style. It is an umbrella term created for artists within the sectors of New Pop, New Romantic, new wave, and post-punk. Even if the terms were synonymous, "New Pop" would be a more logical, natural disambiguation. – Ilovetopaint ( talk) 10:25, 30 May 2016 (UTC) -- Relisting. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 11:42, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on New Pop. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:35, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky ( talk) 15:25, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
New Pop → New pop – Lowercase per MOS:MUSICCAPS and MOS:CAPS. "New pop" is not consistently capitalized in reliable secondary sources, eg this Pitchfork source used in the article. Popcornfud ( talk) 15:54, 23 December 2023 (UTC)