![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
After reading the article, I'm a bit confused. Specialising in medieval culture, I have heard of the term "New Philology" meaning a re-visiting of the historical sources. In earlier days, scholars were interested in reconstructing the authors version of a text/a composition, and often discarded later copies that were obviously too far removed from the "original" version. Later, following the ideas of a "New Philology", scholars were interested in those previously discarded manuscripts, and the insights they could gain from them concerning the people who copied and used them. I hope I'm not mistaken in this, but I would be glad if someone told me if this broader application of the term is legitimate.-- 134.76.2.19 ( talk) 16:14, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
There's a good start-out description at http://www.staff.hum.ku.dk/mjd/words.html on medievalism and New Philoogy, and quite a long bibliography. The absolute start point is the issues of _Speculum_ mentioned at that website... Condesa Traidora ( talk) 09:31, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on New Philology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:26, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
After reading the article, I'm a bit confused. Specialising in medieval culture, I have heard of the term "New Philology" meaning a re-visiting of the historical sources. In earlier days, scholars were interested in reconstructing the authors version of a text/a composition, and often discarded later copies that were obviously too far removed from the "original" version. Later, following the ideas of a "New Philology", scholars were interested in those previously discarded manuscripts, and the insights they could gain from them concerning the people who copied and used them. I hope I'm not mistaken in this, but I would be glad if someone told me if this broader application of the term is legitimate.-- 134.76.2.19 ( talk) 16:14, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
There's a good start-out description at http://www.staff.hum.ku.dk/mjd/words.html on medievalism and New Philoogy, and quite a long bibliography. The absolute start point is the issues of _Speculum_ mentioned at that website... Condesa Traidora ( talk) 09:31, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on New Philology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:26, 17 February 2018 (UTC)