There are also a few bits that are oddly worded for example, "The United States Census Bureau, as of July 1, 2008, estimated New Mexico's population at 1,984,356" How about "As of July 1, 2008, the United States Census Bureau estimated New Mexico's population at 1,984,356.":* DoneNERDYSCIENCEDUDE (
✉ msg •
changes)
04:42, 20 March 2010 (UTC)reply
There are a few sections that are way too small to deserve it's own section. For example, the "Flora and fauna" secion should be merged with perhaps the Geography section or enlarged. It does'nt make since haveing a secion talk aobut flowers if it is entitled "geography" so you may also want to rename that section an appropriate new name if you take my advice. Not a deal breaker but it does seem a bit odd.--
White Shadowsyou're breaking up03:30, 20 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Comment I'm not the one who nominated the article, but I'd say flowers do have something to do with geography. Geography is the study of Earth.--Hadger04:06, 20 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Well, overall, the article is broad in coverage and is on topic. The only exeptions are that you'll need to expand the Sports, Art and Literature adn Education secions a bit. (Along with the others listed above)--
White Shadowsyou're breaking up03:30, 20 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Overall: Well, this is almost there. You'll need to properly adress those issues and then I'll pass it. And as for the deadline, as long as you keep working on it, I'll make the deadline indef. You'll need the extra time. Perhaps you can get Spongefrog and a few other people to help you out. I'd help out but seeing as I am the reviewer, I can't really work on it without a
COI!--
White Shadowsyou're breaking up03:30, 20 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Pass/Fail:
I'm not the reviewer, but I'd say that the Race and ancestry section needs more sources, especially with the percentage of which cultures live there (hopefully you know what I mean). --Hadger04:04, 20 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Comment — This article should not be passed in its current state. Many sections need expansion and lots more refs are required. AaroncrickTALK 04:20, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
He's right. I'm going to have to fail this one since nothing much is happening. I'm sorry NSD, maybe you can keep on working on it and nominate it later.--
White Shadowsyou're breaking up10:52, 14 April 2010 (UTC)reply
There are also a few bits that are oddly worded for example, "The United States Census Bureau, as of July 1, 2008, estimated New Mexico's population at 1,984,356" How about "As of July 1, 2008, the United States Census Bureau estimated New Mexico's population at 1,984,356.":* DoneNERDYSCIENCEDUDE (
✉ msg •
changes)
04:42, 20 March 2010 (UTC)reply
There are a few sections that are way too small to deserve it's own section. For example, the "Flora and fauna" secion should be merged with perhaps the Geography section or enlarged. It does'nt make since haveing a secion talk aobut flowers if it is entitled "geography" so you may also want to rename that section an appropriate new name if you take my advice. Not a deal breaker but it does seem a bit odd.--
White Shadowsyou're breaking up03:30, 20 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Comment I'm not the one who nominated the article, but I'd say flowers do have something to do with geography. Geography is the study of Earth.--Hadger04:06, 20 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Well, overall, the article is broad in coverage and is on topic. The only exeptions are that you'll need to expand the Sports, Art and Literature adn Education secions a bit. (Along with the others listed above)--
White Shadowsyou're breaking up03:30, 20 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Overall: Well, this is almost there. You'll need to properly adress those issues and then I'll pass it. And as for the deadline, as long as you keep working on it, I'll make the deadline indef. You'll need the extra time. Perhaps you can get Spongefrog and a few other people to help you out. I'd help out but seeing as I am the reviewer, I can't really work on it without a
COI!--
White Shadowsyou're breaking up03:30, 20 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Pass/Fail:
I'm not the reviewer, but I'd say that the Race and ancestry section needs more sources, especially with the percentage of which cultures live there (hopefully you know what I mean). --Hadger04:04, 20 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Comment — This article should not be passed in its current state. Many sections need expansion and lots more refs are required. AaroncrickTALK 04:20, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
He's right. I'm going to have to fail this one since nothing much is happening. I'm sorry NSD, maybe you can keep on working on it and nominate it later.--
White Shadowsyou're breaking up10:52, 14 April 2010 (UTC)reply