![]() | New Jersey Route 66 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why do we not cover more than 1 sentence of 33-35 Link? This shouldn't be a Good Article nominee when there is something apparent missing. Mitch/ HC32 18:48, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the review, I have replied to the above changes. I modified some of the information that was not available elsewhere but the press releases. Dough4872 ( talk) 23:50, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Passing. -- Admrboltz ( talk) 00:09, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on New Jersey Route 66. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.visitmonmouth.com/documents%5C24%5CMonmouth%20County%202009%20Projects.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.tintonfalls.com/filestorage/121/673/232/2660/JSPO_AMENDED-REPORTS.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:03, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
![]() | New Jersey Route 66 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why do we not cover more than 1 sentence of 33-35 Link? This shouldn't be a Good Article nominee when there is something apparent missing. Mitch/ HC32 18:48, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the review, I have replied to the above changes. I modified some of the information that was not available elsewhere but the press releases. Dough4872 ( talk) 23:50, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Passing. -- Admrboltz ( talk) 00:09, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on New Jersey Route 66. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.visitmonmouth.com/documents%5C24%5CMonmouth%20County%202009%20Projects.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.tintonfalls.com/filestorage/121/673/232/2660/JSPO_AMENDED-REPORTS.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:03, 17 February 2018 (UTC)