![]() | New Jersey Route 24 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In the first section, it says
I used to live there...there's no cloverleaf exchange there at all. OK, wrong...finally figured out what it was. But it would be useful for someone to insert the appropriate coord template as a "reference" for this information – here's a
link from google local, take the coords from that. —
lensovet–
talk –
06:01, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Well, very nice. This is the 3rd article, with 17 and 33 that i think are B-Class. Some more info and sourcing, then this article can be GA nominated. Mitch azenia (7600+edits) 20:15, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
On hold I have some concerns about the sourcing - the prose is mostly good. -- Rschen7754 ( T C) 20:04, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Passing WP:RS/N seems to think it's okay. That being said, you may have issues if you take this article to FAC or if someone decides to get picky. -- Rschen7754 ( T C) 19:20, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
This article has failed the USRD GA audit and will be sent to WP:GAR if the issues are not resolved within one week. Please see WT:USRD for more details, and please ask me if you have any questions as to why this article failed. -- Rschen7754 ( T C) 04:00, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
This article has a statement, "It resurfaced in the early 1990s as a bypass completely around Morristown that would rejoin the old two-lane route in Mendham Township; it was scrapped in 1993 due to opposition from officials in Morris and Mendham Townships"
There is cited source for this statement:
1. Cichowski, John (November 18, 1992). "Four-Lane Route 24 Opens Amid Hoopla". The Bergen Record.
The cited Record article makes absolutely NO mention about the proposed future bypass around these 2 specific towns or that officials from both towns objected and the plans were scrapped in 1993. It would be pretty hard for a news article from 1992 to report on scrapping plans in 1993. It should be removed as a citation.
The only reference from this 1992 Record article is:
I removed the Record citation on 2/12/13 and added the citation below:
1. http://www.nycroads.com/roads/NJ-24/ NJ 24 Freeway. Scroll down to “Unbuilt” Section.
This new citation is a suitable source for the referenced statement since it indicated:
"Talk of expanding the NJ 24 Freeway west from Morristown to Mendham Township resurfaced in the early 1990's with the completion of the Chatham-to-Morristown section. Officials from Morris Township and Mendham Township protested the freeway extension, which remained on state plans. In response, the NJDOT permanently shelved the western extension to Mendham Township in 1993."
Dough4872 undid this change without any explanation.
When I added the change back in, Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 haneʼ undid my change without any explanation.
Dough4872 needs to explain why The Record citation, which makes NO mention of any of the specific details for this future extension and could NOT forecast in 1992 that the plans were scrapped in 1993, should be reinserted when the NJ 24 Freeway website that I added fully covers the referenced statement. Any comments from Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 haneʼ would be welcomed. Wondering55 ( talk) 23:19, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
The old GA review shouldn't be altered as it forms part of the historic record of this article. In short, the various "roadgeek" websites, like NYC Roads, Alps Roads, Michigan Highways, etc. have not yet met the criteria for the exception to the SPS section of the verifiabilty policy. Quoting that policy, "self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established expert on the subject matter, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party publications." (emphasis in original) Can you demonstrate how these website maintainers are considered experts in this field, and where they have been previously published by third-party publications? Unless and until that happens, they need to be replaced. The fact that the project was more lax about applying this policy, as required by the GA criteria, back in 2008 doesn't mean this article can continue to ignore policy and the applicable criteria. Imzadi 1979 → 00:22, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on New Jersey Route 24. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:55, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
![]() | New Jersey Route 24 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In the first section, it says
I used to live there...there's no cloverleaf exchange there at all. OK, wrong...finally figured out what it was. But it would be useful for someone to insert the appropriate coord template as a "reference" for this information – here's a
link from google local, take the coords from that. —
lensovet–
talk –
06:01, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Well, very nice. This is the 3rd article, with 17 and 33 that i think are B-Class. Some more info and sourcing, then this article can be GA nominated. Mitch azenia (7600+edits) 20:15, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
On hold I have some concerns about the sourcing - the prose is mostly good. -- Rschen7754 ( T C) 20:04, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Passing WP:RS/N seems to think it's okay. That being said, you may have issues if you take this article to FAC or if someone decides to get picky. -- Rschen7754 ( T C) 19:20, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
This article has failed the USRD GA audit and will be sent to WP:GAR if the issues are not resolved within one week. Please see WT:USRD for more details, and please ask me if you have any questions as to why this article failed. -- Rschen7754 ( T C) 04:00, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
This article has a statement, "It resurfaced in the early 1990s as a bypass completely around Morristown that would rejoin the old two-lane route in Mendham Township; it was scrapped in 1993 due to opposition from officials in Morris and Mendham Townships"
There is cited source for this statement:
1. Cichowski, John (November 18, 1992). "Four-Lane Route 24 Opens Amid Hoopla". The Bergen Record.
The cited Record article makes absolutely NO mention about the proposed future bypass around these 2 specific towns or that officials from both towns objected and the plans were scrapped in 1993. It would be pretty hard for a news article from 1992 to report on scrapping plans in 1993. It should be removed as a citation.
The only reference from this 1992 Record article is:
I removed the Record citation on 2/12/13 and added the citation below:
1. http://www.nycroads.com/roads/NJ-24/ NJ 24 Freeway. Scroll down to “Unbuilt” Section.
This new citation is a suitable source for the referenced statement since it indicated:
"Talk of expanding the NJ 24 Freeway west from Morristown to Mendham Township resurfaced in the early 1990's with the completion of the Chatham-to-Morristown section. Officials from Morris Township and Mendham Township protested the freeway extension, which remained on state plans. In response, the NJDOT permanently shelved the western extension to Mendham Township in 1993."
Dough4872 undid this change without any explanation.
When I added the change back in, Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 haneʼ undid my change without any explanation.
Dough4872 needs to explain why The Record citation, which makes NO mention of any of the specific details for this future extension and could NOT forecast in 1992 that the plans were scrapped in 1993, should be reinserted when the NJ 24 Freeway website that I added fully covers the referenced statement. Any comments from Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 haneʼ would be welcomed. Wondering55 ( talk) 23:19, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
The old GA review shouldn't be altered as it forms part of the historic record of this article. In short, the various "roadgeek" websites, like NYC Roads, Alps Roads, Michigan Highways, etc. have not yet met the criteria for the exception to the SPS section of the verifiabilty policy. Quoting that policy, "self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established expert on the subject matter, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party publications." (emphasis in original) Can you demonstrate how these website maintainers are considered experts in this field, and where they have been previously published by third-party publications? Unless and until that happens, they need to be replaced. The fact that the project was more lax about applying this policy, as required by the GA criteria, back in 2008 doesn't mean this article can continue to ignore policy and the applicable criteria. Imzadi 1979 → 00:22, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on New Jersey Route 24. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:55, 17 February 2018 (UTC)