New Finland received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
A fact from New Finland appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 20 December 2010 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have transcluded the peer review. To make further comments to the peer review proper, click here.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because…I would like to see which areas need improvement, and if there are any missing subjects. Would like to see if it could become a "good article" at some date.
Thanks, SriMesh | talk 02:48, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Brianboulton comments:
The lead should briefly summarise the full contents of the article. This lead concentrates almost entirely on the location of the district and its geographical relation to its neighbours. It needs to be rewritten. Note that leads are broad summaries, and should not include small details
There are numerous prose glitches throughout the article. Some examples, taken from the History section
With this number of problems identified in the first section alone, it seems clear that the article needs a thorough all-through copyedit.
As to the article's more general development, some of the sections look in need of development, e.g. Geography, Education (mostly a list of schools). I believe that this could be a credible Category B article, but a fair amount of further work is necessary. Brianboulton ( talk) 00:14, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
Addressing comments made in the above PR SriMesh | talk
Thank you to Brianboulton who took the time to make a few comments in the peer review. These have been addressed where possible. The comments regarding templates established by wikipedia were not addressed, as that is for the each respective template talk page and not for this venue. SriMesh | talk 20:43, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on New Finland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:40, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
New Finland received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
A fact from New Finland appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 20 December 2010 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have transcluded the peer review. To make further comments to the peer review proper, click here.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because…I would like to see which areas need improvement, and if there are any missing subjects. Would like to see if it could become a "good article" at some date.
Thanks, SriMesh | talk 02:48, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Brianboulton comments:
The lead should briefly summarise the full contents of the article. This lead concentrates almost entirely on the location of the district and its geographical relation to its neighbours. It needs to be rewritten. Note that leads are broad summaries, and should not include small details
There are numerous prose glitches throughout the article. Some examples, taken from the History section
With this number of problems identified in the first section alone, it seems clear that the article needs a thorough all-through copyedit.
As to the article's more general development, some of the sections look in need of development, e.g. Geography, Education (mostly a list of schools). I believe that this could be a credible Category B article, but a fair amount of further work is necessary. Brianboulton ( talk) 00:14, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
Addressing comments made in the above PR SriMesh | talk
Thank you to Brianboulton who took the time to make a few comments in the peer review. These have been addressed where possible. The comments regarding templates established by wikipedia were not addressed, as that is for the each respective template talk page and not for this venue. SriMesh | talk 20:43, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on New Finland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:40, 17 February 2018 (UTC)