This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Geology Low‑importance Talk:New Albany Shale is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Illinois This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. United States: Indiana / Kentucky This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Kentucky (assessed as Low-importance).

Anybody have better estimates on New Albany? [1]

86-160tcf seems to be a more modern estimate but has drilling really gotten that much better since the 2001 estimate of 1.9-19.2 tcf? TMLutas ( talk) 15:58, 6 April 2010 (UTC) reply

The source for the 86-160 TCF is a map, the source of which is not given. Is this OGIP or actual recoverable reserves? The map does not say. Please don't erase a reference until you have a better one. Plazak ( talk) 01:33, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply