This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Internet culture This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Internet culture To-do: history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles Expand : Pick an article from here or here Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images Stubs : All stubs are located here Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}} See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

changes: Ted Byfield was linked to wrong Ted Byfield (no page for the professor of art). Ricardo Dominguez was also linked to the wrong person. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.15.49.189 ( talk) 19:53, 14 February 2011 (UTC) reply

While it has its fascinating aspects, does the membership list belong in this article? At a minimum, I would propose dropping all red-linked and dab-linked entries. Is there a reliable source for the list?  —jmcgnh ^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:32, 25 July 2016 (UTC) reply

I would be interested in digging through the mailing list for users up through ZPK5 (1999), ReadMe!, which is generally considered nettime's most important release. As I understand the group, that was its peak in influence. I could then source all contributors prior to that who have Wikipedia pages. I would think including Ted Byfield and Felix Stalder would be ok... I'm surprised they don't have pages themselves, as they've been influential in digital media studies. I'm not really a wikimedian though, jmcgnh, I've just been using this list of nettime participants to direct my personal studies for several years. What do you think? Is there a better way to do it? Should we really nuke the whole list? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.108.23.98 ( talk) 16:58, 10 August 2017 (UTC) reply

@ 74.108.23.98: After more than a year with no response, I am under the impression that this is not a closely watched paged. If the current list has been useful to you, then I wouldn't object to keeping it. But the question about verifiability remains. — jmcgnh ^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:29, 10 August 2017 (UTC) reply

So I just undid a big change someone had made. They essentially deleted all the text. Insofar as "This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia.", and given nettime's legacy, I think the 11,000 byte reduction without discussion was unwarranted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.108.23.98 ( talk) 17:12, 19 June 2017 (UTC) reply