![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
File:Nestle Purina's solar farm in Colorado.jpg
During the Good Article review, User:DocumentError passed the article, but suggested it could use more images if available. I mentioned I would try to obtain some from Purina and just received a Declaration of Consent for this beauty [mentioned above]. Suggest adding it at the top of "Recent history" where their solar farm in Colorado is discussed. CorporateM ( Talk) 21:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
FYI - someone brought this to my attention offline. Glassdoor's 7th annual best places to work ranking placed Nestle Purina Petcare in the third place spot. Per my own advice at WP:ORGAWARDS, I do not believe such rankings/awards belong in the article, unless there is a secondary source, independent from the award organizers, that covers the company winning the award (or in other exceptions: articles should always contain a market-share ranking/value where available and some rankings like the Fortune 500 are unquestionably notable). This is especially the case here, since the rankings are based on crowd-sourced reviews. However, user:FreeRangeFrog recently went the other way on a similar issue on another article and my views are not necessarily representative of any clear and overwhelming community consensus. So I'll just share it here in case anyone has an opinion. CorporateM ( Talk) 16:27, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: DocumentError ( talk · contribs) 08:45, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi - comments follow. DOCUMENT ★ ERROR 08:12, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
1a. (prose)
1b. (MoS)
2a. (ref layout)
2b. (RS)
2c. (OR)
3a. (broadness)
3b. (focus)
4. (neutral)
5. (stable)
6a. (free pics)
6b. (relevant pics)
PASS! DOCUMENT ★ ERROR 21:53, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
@ GypsySlide: recently made some edits here regarding a new class action lawsuit about allegations of contaminants in Beneful. However, the text only included the plaintiff's point-of-view and is probably better covered on the Beneful page with a sentence or two summary here.
I'd like to suggest the lawsuit content be integrated into the Beneful page and be written in a manner that summarizes multiple viewpoints, rather than just that of consumers. I've put together a proposed draft at User:CorporateM/Purina. A more detailed annotated comparison of the two versions is available here. CorporateM ( Talk) 01:43, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
According to the USDA/APHIS web site, in 20014 Purina operated a 500 dog and 700 cay animal lab. Purina will not publicly talk about the type of experiments that are conducted on animals in its labs.Cite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page).
The St. Louis facility is only one of the three headquarters of Nestle Purina. Its a global company with two other headquarters:
https://www.nestlepurinacareers.com/why-purina/our-locations/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.147.135.66 ( talk) 13:57, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
File:Nestle Purina's solar farm in Colorado.jpg
During the Good Article review, User:DocumentError passed the article, but suggested it could use more images if available. I mentioned I would try to obtain some from Purina and just received a Declaration of Consent for this beauty [mentioned above]. Suggest adding it at the top of "Recent history" where their solar farm in Colorado is discussed. CorporateM ( Talk) 21:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
FYI - someone brought this to my attention offline. Glassdoor's 7th annual best places to work ranking placed Nestle Purina Petcare in the third place spot. Per my own advice at WP:ORGAWARDS, I do not believe such rankings/awards belong in the article, unless there is a secondary source, independent from the award organizers, that covers the company winning the award (or in other exceptions: articles should always contain a market-share ranking/value where available and some rankings like the Fortune 500 are unquestionably notable). This is especially the case here, since the rankings are based on crowd-sourced reviews. However, user:FreeRangeFrog recently went the other way on a similar issue on another article and my views are not necessarily representative of any clear and overwhelming community consensus. So I'll just share it here in case anyone has an opinion. CorporateM ( Talk) 16:27, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: DocumentError ( talk · contribs) 08:45, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi - comments follow. DOCUMENT ★ ERROR 08:12, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
1a. (prose)
1b. (MoS)
2a. (ref layout)
2b. (RS)
2c. (OR)
3a. (broadness)
3b. (focus)
4. (neutral)
5. (stable)
6a. (free pics)
6b. (relevant pics)
PASS! DOCUMENT ★ ERROR 21:53, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
@ GypsySlide: recently made some edits here regarding a new class action lawsuit about allegations of contaminants in Beneful. However, the text only included the plaintiff's point-of-view and is probably better covered on the Beneful page with a sentence or two summary here.
I'd like to suggest the lawsuit content be integrated into the Beneful page and be written in a manner that summarizes multiple viewpoints, rather than just that of consumers. I've put together a proposed draft at User:CorporateM/Purina. A more detailed annotated comparison of the two versions is available here. CorporateM ( Talk) 01:43, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
According to the USDA/APHIS web site, in 20014 Purina operated a 500 dog and 700 cay animal lab. Purina will not publicly talk about the type of experiments that are conducted on animals in its labs.Cite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page).
The St. Louis facility is only one of the three headquarters of Nestle Purina. Its a global company with two other headquarters:
https://www.nestlepurinacareers.com/why-purina/our-locations/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.147.135.66 ( talk) 13:57, 1 August 2015 (UTC)