This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nebula Award has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
Nebula Award is the main article in the Nebula Award series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
A picture of the actual award would be nice... -- JollyRogerz 13:31, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Word within SFWA from numerous sources is that the award has no bearing on sales, and can, in fact, reduce advances and sales of an author who isn't already an established name. Both the Hugo and Nebula are seen as being "literary" and pretentious by many readers. It's entirely dependent upon how the author's existing market is perceived. 209.43.8.69 00:51, 25 January 2007 (UTC) Michael Z. Williamson
Changed "award is handed out" to "Award is presented" since the former seems to belittle it. 209.43.8.69 00:56, 25 January 2007 (UTC) Michael Z. Williamson
I've shortened and ordered the list of notable Nebula winners. In the interest of scannability and conciseness, I cut down the list to anyone who has won the award three times or more. Without wanting to exclude anyone in particular, the list must be short enough to read well in paragraph form, so it cannot include every Nebula winner who some wikipedian thinks is notable enough to add to this list--I assume that's how this list grew so monstrous in the first place.
Also, how do we list a reference for this? The Nebula Award for Best Novel and related pages have references--can someone come up with a concise way of noting the source for this information? Tdimhcs ( talk) 20:54, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin ( talk · contribs) 10:09, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Responded inline. -- Pres N 21:15, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Something is off here. On the list there is no mention of Samuel R. Delany's winning the Nebula Award for "Ye, and Gomorrah" for Short Story, the same year he won it for "The Einstien Intersection" as best SF novel. I know he won it for the short story, because I am looking at the twelve(?) pound block of lucite with the sparkly things inside which he/I was presented with that evening in New York in 1968 right now. Beset wishes. (SRD) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.52.140.190 ( talk) 14:37, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
The individual article pages, best script, best short story, best novelette, nest novella and best novel, the tables need some serious work. Most awards tables use rowspans for the year only to make it easier to read and separate the different nominees and winners. Examples: Academy Award for Best Writing (Original Screenplay), Golden Globe Award for Best Screenplay. Also, they all include this little tidbit:
It's completely unnecessary to have the winners "*" when they are already highlighted within the table and the "+" is also redundant if the "no award" is highlighted gray. Lady Lotus ( talk) 17:30, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
We say in the lead that the 2012 Awards were presented in Washington DC, May 2012.
The sponsor SFWA at "Nebula Awards Winners" (announced) calls those the 2011 winners --and that dating convention holds back to "2000 Nebula Award Winners" at the bottom of the same page.
I don't know who consistently we or they follow the pattern reported here. -- P64 ( talk) 18:35, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
May I ask for clarification on this issue? At least with recent announcements, the SFWA websites and press releases themselves use publication year as the designation for awards, not ceremony date. (in other words, the "2015 Nebula" is given in a ceremony in 2016 for works published in 2015). Does Wikipedia have a standard rule about this, and if not shouldn't we be using the organization's own system? AnneTG ( talk) 23:05, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Nebula Award. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:45, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
The “list of categories” internal link is dead and there is no current list, let alone link, of winners. Or is this exclusive to iPhones? Signinstranger ( talk) 17:27, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nebula Award has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
Nebula Award is the main article in the Nebula Award series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
A picture of the actual award would be nice... -- JollyRogerz 13:31, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Word within SFWA from numerous sources is that the award has no bearing on sales, and can, in fact, reduce advances and sales of an author who isn't already an established name. Both the Hugo and Nebula are seen as being "literary" and pretentious by many readers. It's entirely dependent upon how the author's existing market is perceived. 209.43.8.69 00:51, 25 January 2007 (UTC) Michael Z. Williamson
Changed "award is handed out" to "Award is presented" since the former seems to belittle it. 209.43.8.69 00:56, 25 January 2007 (UTC) Michael Z. Williamson
I've shortened and ordered the list of notable Nebula winners. In the interest of scannability and conciseness, I cut down the list to anyone who has won the award three times or more. Without wanting to exclude anyone in particular, the list must be short enough to read well in paragraph form, so it cannot include every Nebula winner who some wikipedian thinks is notable enough to add to this list--I assume that's how this list grew so monstrous in the first place.
Also, how do we list a reference for this? The Nebula Award for Best Novel and related pages have references--can someone come up with a concise way of noting the source for this information? Tdimhcs ( talk) 20:54, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin ( talk · contribs) 10:09, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Responded inline. -- Pres N 21:15, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Something is off here. On the list there is no mention of Samuel R. Delany's winning the Nebula Award for "Ye, and Gomorrah" for Short Story, the same year he won it for "The Einstien Intersection" as best SF novel. I know he won it for the short story, because I am looking at the twelve(?) pound block of lucite with the sparkly things inside which he/I was presented with that evening in New York in 1968 right now. Beset wishes. (SRD) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.52.140.190 ( talk) 14:37, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
The individual article pages, best script, best short story, best novelette, nest novella and best novel, the tables need some serious work. Most awards tables use rowspans for the year only to make it easier to read and separate the different nominees and winners. Examples: Academy Award for Best Writing (Original Screenplay), Golden Globe Award for Best Screenplay. Also, they all include this little tidbit:
It's completely unnecessary to have the winners "*" when they are already highlighted within the table and the "+" is also redundant if the "no award" is highlighted gray. Lady Lotus ( talk) 17:30, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
We say in the lead that the 2012 Awards were presented in Washington DC, May 2012.
The sponsor SFWA at "Nebula Awards Winners" (announced) calls those the 2011 winners --and that dating convention holds back to "2000 Nebula Award Winners" at the bottom of the same page.
I don't know who consistently we or they follow the pattern reported here. -- P64 ( talk) 18:35, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
May I ask for clarification on this issue? At least with recent announcements, the SFWA websites and press releases themselves use publication year as the designation for awards, not ceremony date. (in other words, the "2015 Nebula" is given in a ceremony in 2016 for works published in 2015). Does Wikipedia have a standard rule about this, and if not shouldn't we be using the organization's own system? AnneTG ( talk) 23:05, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Nebula Award. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:45, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
The “list of categories” internal link is dead and there is no current list, let alone link, of winners. Or is this exclusive to iPhones? Signinstranger ( talk) 17:27, 5 April 2021 (UTC)