![]() | Nebka has been listed as one of the
History good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 23, 2019. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=nebka
The article
Nabkha already exists; I guess adding hatnotes to both articles is the best solution...
Edit-pi (
talk)
23:43, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Khruner ( talk · contribs) 20:01, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
I think everything looks fine. The sources are undoubtedly reliable and well used, and the article itself seems to be exhaustive, well written, stable and neutral. Khruner ( talk) 16:44, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
![]() | Nebka has been listed as one of the
History good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 23, 2019. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=nebka
The article
Nabkha already exists; I guess adding hatnotes to both articles is the best solution...
Edit-pi (
talk)
23:43, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Khruner ( talk · contribs) 20:01, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
I think everything looks fine. The sources are undoubtedly reliable and well used, and the article itself seems to be exhaustive, well written, stable and neutral. Khruner ( talk) 16:44, 23 April 2019 (UTC)