![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Nearly neutral theory of molecular evolution appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 13 May 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
the external link returns a 404 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.42.64.47 ( talk) 03:53, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
I'm thinking it might be reasonable to cover the neutral and nearly neutral theory in one article, perhaps. At this stage the neutral theory article isn't very long and this one is quite short, so adding it as a subsection of the neutral theory article is reasonable. However if the details of these theories are expanded it might be more suitable to have two articles to make room for all the details. Richard001 ( talk) 03:20, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Nearly neutral theory of molecular evolution appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 13 May 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
the external link returns a 404 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.42.64.47 ( talk) 03:53, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
I'm thinking it might be reasonable to cover the neutral and nearly neutral theory in one article, perhaps. At this stage the neutral theory article isn't very long and this one is quite short, so adding it as a subsection of the neutral theory article is reasonable. However if the details of these theories are expanded it might be more suitable to have two articles to make room for all the details. Richard001 ( talk) 03:20, 19 September 2010 (UTC)