![]() | This is the
talk page of a
redirect that targets the page: • Real-time computing Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Real-time computing |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Near real-time page were merged into Real-time computing on April, 2014 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
This article might be copied verbatim from another website: http://www.atis.org/tg2k/_near_real_time.html . Note that the defiintions are identical word-for-word in places. (It may also be that ATIS copied from Wikipedia.) -Kelly Keck 72.9.31.44 14:13, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Can a meaningful distinction be made between "near real time" and "real time"? If "near real time" is real time, minus processing time; and processing time for any event is always non-zero, (at the very least there will be lightspeed delays) then true "real time" is impossible except at zero distance, which is not possible for bosons. Essentially, everything "real time" would actually be "near real time". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.36.186.2 ( talk) 13:14, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
talk page of a
redirect that targets the page: • Real-time computing Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Real-time computing |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Near real-time page were merged into Real-time computing on April, 2014 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
This article might be copied verbatim from another website: http://www.atis.org/tg2k/_near_real_time.html . Note that the defiintions are identical word-for-word in places. (It may also be that ATIS copied from Wikipedia.) -Kelly Keck 72.9.31.44 14:13, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Can a meaningful distinction be made between "near real time" and "real time"? If "near real time" is real time, minus processing time; and processing time for any event is always non-zero, (at the very least there will be lightspeed delays) then true "real time" is impossible except at zero distance, which is not possible for bosons. Essentially, everything "real time" would actually be "near real time". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.36.186.2 ( talk) 13:14, 25 April 2008 (UTC)