This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Greece This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Classical Greece and Rome This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Fashion This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article was nominated for deletion on 9 September 2010. The result of the discussion was keep.

Pliny actually wrote Sutor, ne ultra judicaret I gather from Google but I didn't see the point of labouring it. By all means do if you think it's worth it. Rinpoche ( talk) 04:30, 9 September 2010 (UTC) reply

Which part of Google? "Sutor, ne ultra judicaret" has your comment as the single instance of its occurance in its database. —  LlywelynII 16:34, 6 July 2023 (UTC) reply

I'm not sure where I read it, but isn't it also said as just "Ne ultra crepidam"? --Tristyn ^⌘ 03:53, 20 June 2014 (UTC) reply

I mean, if you're talking directly to a shoemaker, sure. —  LlywelynII 16:36, 6 July 2023 (UTC) reply

The meager content of Ultracrepidarianism should be incorporated in this article. For their polemical purposes Hazlitt and his friend coined just an adjective; the making of substantive, one among the many "-isms" is something that has to be elaborated. There is simply not enough substance for a separate article. 77.85.32.26 ( talk) 16:10, 29 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Done. Ultracrepidarianism page is left for Redirect. Ael 2 ( talk) 17:43, 4 February 2021 (UTC) reply

The form of the expression was ne supra crepidam sutor iudicaret and ultracrepidarian doesn't derive from a mangling of that expression but, as should be obvious, from the prefix ultra- and the word crepidarian. —  LlywelynII 16:37, 6 July 2023 (UTC) reply