This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hey, Vinithehat, why did you put all the citations in-line? As the initial (and so far sole) contributor to this article, I used Harvard style, and I claim priority for that style. (See Wikipedia:Citing sources#Citation styles: "You should follow the style already established in an article".) You mind if it goes back to the way it was? - J. Johnson (JJ) ( talk) 20:42, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
I have restored the prior mode of citation. - J. Johnson (JJ) ( talk) 22:17, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Joe: yes, very nice. But two points. 1) The table (images) really should be smaller (like the original set of images). Perhaps even arranged in the same manner as before? 2) Could we have the ICS row on top?
(1) I chose these sizes for the following reasons:
The table itself is wider because of the increased padding to the left and right of flag images to give the light gray background more prominence in each cell. This cell design was one of your earliest suggestions in our discussion on the Talk:International_maritime_signal_flags page. You wrote, "Also, the column with the flag images should be a little wider so that the gray at the sides isn't completely squeezed out" (which I numbered as 7).
I don't think this needs to be changed, but it may be a worthwhile project to give the other flag tables on the page a similar style.
(2) I have no objection if you wish to exchange the ICS and NATO rows.
-- JoeDeRose ( talk) 00:13, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Following link ( this) is a codebook of NATO signals (found it via google). A table with the meaning of a few signals (as in the International Code of Signals article) should be made in the article. I will work on it in the near future. Also, is this page a reliable source? It has examples of the use of the pennants. 69.165.196.103 ( talk) 13:51, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hey, Vinithehat, why did you put all the citations in-line? As the initial (and so far sole) contributor to this article, I used Harvard style, and I claim priority for that style. (See Wikipedia:Citing sources#Citation styles: "You should follow the style already established in an article".) You mind if it goes back to the way it was? - J. Johnson (JJ) ( talk) 20:42, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
I have restored the prior mode of citation. - J. Johnson (JJ) ( talk) 22:17, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Joe: yes, very nice. But two points. 1) The table (images) really should be smaller (like the original set of images). Perhaps even arranged in the same manner as before? 2) Could we have the ICS row on top?
(1) I chose these sizes for the following reasons:
The table itself is wider because of the increased padding to the left and right of flag images to give the light gray background more prominence in each cell. This cell design was one of your earliest suggestions in our discussion on the Talk:International_maritime_signal_flags page. You wrote, "Also, the column with the flag images should be a little wider so that the gray at the sides isn't completely squeezed out" (which I numbered as 7).
I don't think this needs to be changed, but it may be a worthwhile project to give the other flag tables on the page a similar style.
(2) I have no objection if you wish to exchange the ICS and NATO rows.
-- JoeDeRose ( talk) 00:13, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Following link ( this) is a codebook of NATO signals (found it via google). A table with the meaning of a few signals (as in the International Code of Signals article) should be made in the article. I will work on it in the near future. Also, is this page a reliable source? It has examples of the use of the pennants. 69.165.196.103 ( talk) 13:51, 24 June 2017 (UTC)