![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article should be merged with the article "Naval Station Rota," which was created due to a false link. Someone needs to clean it up. Also, the stub should be at the end. Make sure you get the part about the Taco Bell in there, as that's a major selling point for Rota.
Then again, only an American would consider Taco Bell a "major selling point." Truly a shame.
BASES FUERA —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.42.236.200 ( talk) 07:24, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Why is it the only picture that keeps getting removed is the one of a US Warship? Its a joint base but you'd never know that from the images. Justin talk 16:12, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
I like this new picture and support its insertion. As the article is about a major military location with all the issues that brings, as a BLP issue the photo with a picture of a few people gives a possible undue weight to their importance in the issue and the new picture has none of those issue. Off2riorob ( talk) 10:14 pm, Today (UTC+1)
We can remove the new picture also for me but the picture with living people in it is a BLP issue. Off2riorob ( talk) 21:31, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
The BLP issue for me is that the article is not about them and they are the only living people in the article and their involvment in the issue is being given undue weight by the inclusion of the pic. Off2riorob ( talk) 21:42, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
No, the layout you proposed isn't better at all; neither is your picture showing the base. I'm not convinced. Apparently Off2riorob isn't either. Your concern is noted, but it's still 2 to 1. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.129.38.32 ( talk) 22:57, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
The creative punctuation of: "The protests against the base are considered controversial amongst local residents, with some opposed to the protests, because the base provides jobs and businesses benefit from money derived from the Spanish and U.S. military; as well as those in agreement with the protestors' aims." Makes one wonder what is meant by the text tacked onto the end after the semi-colon - whatever it is, it isn't an independent clause so wonder what it is referring to... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.158.48.90 ( talk) 10:57, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Naval Station Rota, Spain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:35, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Displayed logo doesn't seem to be the right one. Not sure if the base has two different logos, a Spanish logo and an US logo in which case both could be displayed or there is a shared logo, but the logo displayed in the article doesn't appear in the Spanish Navy website ( see https://armada.defensa.gob.es/ArmadaPortal/page/Portal/ArmadaEspannola/conocenosorganizacion/prefLang-es/04Apoyofuerza--01jal--05Arsenales--01arsenalcadiz--04bnavalrotabienvenida-es ). -- Stoni ( talk) 11:49, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article should be merged with the article "Naval Station Rota," which was created due to a false link. Someone needs to clean it up. Also, the stub should be at the end. Make sure you get the part about the Taco Bell in there, as that's a major selling point for Rota.
Then again, only an American would consider Taco Bell a "major selling point." Truly a shame.
BASES FUERA —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.42.236.200 ( talk) 07:24, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Why is it the only picture that keeps getting removed is the one of a US Warship? Its a joint base but you'd never know that from the images. Justin talk 16:12, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
I like this new picture and support its insertion. As the article is about a major military location with all the issues that brings, as a BLP issue the photo with a picture of a few people gives a possible undue weight to their importance in the issue and the new picture has none of those issue. Off2riorob ( talk) 10:14 pm, Today (UTC+1)
We can remove the new picture also for me but the picture with living people in it is a BLP issue. Off2riorob ( talk) 21:31, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
The BLP issue for me is that the article is not about them and they are the only living people in the article and their involvment in the issue is being given undue weight by the inclusion of the pic. Off2riorob ( talk) 21:42, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
No, the layout you proposed isn't better at all; neither is your picture showing the base. I'm not convinced. Apparently Off2riorob isn't either. Your concern is noted, but it's still 2 to 1. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.129.38.32 ( talk) 22:57, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
The creative punctuation of: "The protests against the base are considered controversial amongst local residents, with some opposed to the protests, because the base provides jobs and businesses benefit from money derived from the Spanish and U.S. military; as well as those in agreement with the protestors' aims." Makes one wonder what is meant by the text tacked onto the end after the semi-colon - whatever it is, it isn't an independent clause so wonder what it is referring to... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.158.48.90 ( talk) 10:57, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Naval Station Rota, Spain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:35, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Displayed logo doesn't seem to be the right one. Not sure if the base has two different logos, a Spanish logo and an US logo in which case both could be displayed or there is a shared logo, but the logo displayed in the article doesn't appear in the Spanish Navy website ( see https://armada.defensa.gob.es/ArmadaPortal/page/Portal/ArmadaEspannola/conocenosorganizacion/prefLang-es/04Apoyofuerza--01jal--05Arsenales--01arsenalcadiz--04bnavalrotabienvenida-es ). -- Stoni ( talk) 11:49, 31 May 2020 (UTC)