This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia: Indigenous peoples Low‑importance Nauwalabila I is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Indigenous peoples of Australia. Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian What's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. Archaeology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Anthropology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The article is neutral and has a wide array of sources used within the article. Sentences were succinct and the article as a whole was cohesive. All is relevant and easy to understand.

Viewpoints of archaeologists are represented, though this is an archaeology article.

All links work and citations number above five. Sources back up the article, article represents the statements from the cited works faithfully.

Every statement is backed up with a source. These sources are objective and neutral, only relaying findings from the articles.

Sources are all up-to-date: the oldest is from the mid 90's.

Personal ideas: I think it would be interesting if you expanded on the findings: like the rock art's appearance beyond the material. Though I think pictures can do that for you as well.

This article was well-written and straight to the point, as any good wikipedia article should be. I can tell you did the work synthesizing. The word count is under 500 words, so I would expand on some of your points to get to that point. Amazing work, this will be a great article! Sbisho ( talk) 21:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC) reply

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 March 2024 and 30 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Evkmpn ( article contribs). Peer reviewers: Fendragon57, Sbisho.

— Assignment last updated by Fendragon57 ( talk) 15:43, 31 May 2024 (UTC) reply

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Clearly written and appropriately referenced.

Klbrain ( talk) 20:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC) reply