![]() | National symbols of the Philippines has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: May 10, 2016. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is written in Philippine English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, realize, center, travelled) and some terms that are used in it (including jeepney and cyberlibel) may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: LT910001 ( talk · contribs) 10:20, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
I'll take this review. Many thanks for your edits to this interesting article! I will review this article against the six good article criteria (
WP:GA?). I'll take 2-3 days to familiarise myself with the article and update you on my assessment then. Something important for an article like this that I'll note at the outside is that a list of unofficial symbols is verifiable, with good reliable sources provided to support items that are listed. Speak to you in 2-3 days, --
Tom (LT) (
talk)
10:20, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Very well-written |
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Addressed |
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | |
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | |
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | None found - samples checked |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Checked |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | One exception - see below |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. |
An engaging and well-written article. I can't see any major issues that would prevent this article from passing. I will check the sources and for copyright/plagiarism and let you know my findings. -- Tom (LT) ( talk) 00:50, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
These sections need citations:
I am having trouble verifying these statements:
I look forward to your replies, -- Tom (LT) ( talk) 07:39, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Tom (LT), thank you very much for your very nice review.
Here are my replies:
I hope the changes that I made addressed the issues. Please let me know if you have any other concerns or questions. Thanks. -- Jojit ( talk) 09:39, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on National symbols of the Philippines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:23, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
february 17 representative animal 112.203.208.172 ( talk) 10:08, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
What are the cultural,social,political, economic symbols? 124.6.149.242 ( talk) 04:33, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
![]() | National symbols of the Philippines has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: May 10, 2016. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is written in Philippine English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, realize, center, travelled) and some terms that are used in it (including jeepney and cyberlibel) may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: LT910001 ( talk · contribs) 10:20, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
I'll take this review. Many thanks for your edits to this interesting article! I will review this article against the six good article criteria (
WP:GA?). I'll take 2-3 days to familiarise myself with the article and update you on my assessment then. Something important for an article like this that I'll note at the outside is that a list of unofficial symbols is verifiable, with good reliable sources provided to support items that are listed. Speak to you in 2-3 days, --
Tom (LT) (
talk)
10:20, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Very well-written |
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Addressed |
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | |
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | |
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | None found - samples checked |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Checked |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | One exception - see below |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. |
An engaging and well-written article. I can't see any major issues that would prevent this article from passing. I will check the sources and for copyright/plagiarism and let you know my findings. -- Tom (LT) ( talk) 00:50, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
These sections need citations:
I am having trouble verifying these statements:
I look forward to your replies, -- Tom (LT) ( talk) 07:39, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Tom (LT), thank you very much for your very nice review.
Here are my replies:
I hope the changes that I made addressed the issues. Please let me know if you have any other concerns or questions. Thanks. -- Jojit ( talk) 09:39, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on National symbols of the Philippines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:23, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
february 17 representative animal 112.203.208.172 ( talk) 10:08, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
What are the cultural,social,political, economic symbols? 124.6.149.242 ( talk) 04:33, 18 October 2022 (UTC)