This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
National Socialist Motor Corps article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from National Socialist Motor Corps appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 5 May 2005. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I don't think the National Socialist Driver Corps was a paramilitary troop, considering it consisted of all german drivers (as far as I know) and belongs to the category of suborganisations of the NSDAP. By the way, changed it from "Automobil Korps" to "Kraftfahrerkorps", it did not consist of cars. Noya Watan 12:56, 2005 May 1 (UTC)
I made the redirect page as per your suggestion and added the alternate title in the article. I think its called that in the UK. Most American textbooks list it as "Motor Corps".
Shouldn't the German name for the organization be mentioned? john k 21:07, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
"In the mid 1930s, the NSKK also served as a roadside assistance group, much comparable to the modern day American Automobile Association."
Why is the NSKK being compared to a US organisation? Is there a specific similarity? Wouldn't it make more sense to change it into something like this?
"In the mid 1930s, the NSKK also served as a roadside assistance group, much comparable to modern day organisations such as the German ADAC."
JeroenHoek 17:50, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
Image:NSKK.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 14:46, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
National Socialist Motor Corps article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from National Socialist Motor Corps appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 5 May 2005. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I don't think the National Socialist Driver Corps was a paramilitary troop, considering it consisted of all german drivers (as far as I know) and belongs to the category of suborganisations of the NSDAP. By the way, changed it from "Automobil Korps" to "Kraftfahrerkorps", it did not consist of cars. Noya Watan 12:56, 2005 May 1 (UTC)
I made the redirect page as per your suggestion and added the alternate title in the article. I think its called that in the UK. Most American textbooks list it as "Motor Corps".
Shouldn't the German name for the organization be mentioned? john k 21:07, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
"In the mid 1930s, the NSKK also served as a roadside assistance group, much comparable to the modern day American Automobile Association."
Why is the NSKK being compared to a US organisation? Is there a specific similarity? Wouldn't it make more sense to change it into something like this?
"In the mid 1930s, the NSKK also served as a roadside assistance group, much comparable to modern day organisations such as the German ADAC."
JeroenHoek 17:50, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
Image:NSKK.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 14:46, 8 March 2008 (UTC)