This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
National Revolutionary Army article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Was the NRA abolished? Destroyed? -- Jia ng 04:03, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)
I'm pretty illiterate but 國民革命軍 was nowhere to be found on the mnd page. The modern army is historically continuous with the NRA but they call it 陸軍 and not 國民革命軍. Then is there evidence of name change at [1]? Let's ask someone who will be able to read all that.-- Jia ng 05:59, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Jiang dragged me here. Re: his Google hits that have years, numbers, etc:
And that's all the references to the ROC Army on that page. That page does also mention the RNA, but it doesn't say what the link is. The other first few Google hits do not mention name change either.
I didn't come across any reference to name change in those Google links.
Re: Vardion's first link. As Jiang said, there's no mentions of the NRA anywhere on that page. It only refers to the the "ROC Army in the Allied Troops' Chinese Theatre" (同盟國中國戰區陸軍) -- established in the winter of 1944 -- as the modern ROC Army's predecessor. That name was shortened post-war (June 1, 1946). -- Menchi 19:27, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)
A nice detailed article, well-organized, with lots of pictures. I can't help but wonder, however, if significant expansion is still possible. LordAmeth 11:53, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Trying to dig out some information about use of 37mm Gun M3 by non-US forces. According to "Zaloga, Delf - US Anti-tank Artillery 1941-45", 1,669 pieces were supplied to the "Kuomintang Army". Is there any information of this weapon being used by the NRA ? Thanks in advance. Bukvoed 11:00, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Image:HY1935 bayonet.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 22:32, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Does anyone know when the meaning of "Guojun" changed from "National Revolutionary Army" to the "Republic of China Armed Forces"? It seems that in 1950 in Taiwan, Chiang Kai-shek still refered Guojun as the NRA [2]. Nobody today will mistake Guojun for the NRA, but does anyone know when the transition was made? Blueshirts ( talk) 22:54, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Guojun means National Army. So NRA and ROC armed forces refer to the same thing, the national army. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blastjet ( talk • contribs) 02:21, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
We are having problems of trying to determine whether to keep the "Western" or "German" description when comparing the competence of NRA's Foreign-trained elite divisions. So, this discussion is to discuss the disagreement. I have tried to retain the "Western" comparison because of it's broad range including the Germans. Liu Tao ( talk) 05:40, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
http://chinesemartialstudies.com/2012/11/26/693/
http://www.chineselongsword.com/dadao.shtml
http://thomaschen.freewebspace .com/photo5.html
http://thomaschen.freewebspace .com/photo6.html
http://lezaiqizhong.net/Lihua%20Webpages/ShangshanXiaxiang.htm
http://listverse.com/2013/02/23/10-terrible-things-done-to-pows/
http://edition.cnn.com/WORLD/9609/23/rare.photos/index.html
07:45, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on National Revolutionary Army. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:16, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
I have recently added a section to the Nanjing decade page for military developments in this period they could also be added here but this would require major article restructuring I think which is not my forte. The article in general requires restructuring too. Hurera123 ( talk) 20:13, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
National Revolutionary Army article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Was the NRA abolished? Destroyed? -- Jia ng 04:03, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)
I'm pretty illiterate but 國民革命軍 was nowhere to be found on the mnd page. The modern army is historically continuous with the NRA but they call it 陸軍 and not 國民革命軍. Then is there evidence of name change at [1]? Let's ask someone who will be able to read all that.-- Jia ng 05:59, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Jiang dragged me here. Re: his Google hits that have years, numbers, etc:
And that's all the references to the ROC Army on that page. That page does also mention the RNA, but it doesn't say what the link is. The other first few Google hits do not mention name change either.
I didn't come across any reference to name change in those Google links.
Re: Vardion's first link. As Jiang said, there's no mentions of the NRA anywhere on that page. It only refers to the the "ROC Army in the Allied Troops' Chinese Theatre" (同盟國中國戰區陸軍) -- established in the winter of 1944 -- as the modern ROC Army's predecessor. That name was shortened post-war (June 1, 1946). -- Menchi 19:27, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)
A nice detailed article, well-organized, with lots of pictures. I can't help but wonder, however, if significant expansion is still possible. LordAmeth 11:53, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Trying to dig out some information about use of 37mm Gun M3 by non-US forces. According to "Zaloga, Delf - US Anti-tank Artillery 1941-45", 1,669 pieces were supplied to the "Kuomintang Army". Is there any information of this weapon being used by the NRA ? Thanks in advance. Bukvoed 11:00, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Image:HY1935 bayonet.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 22:32, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Does anyone know when the meaning of "Guojun" changed from "National Revolutionary Army" to the "Republic of China Armed Forces"? It seems that in 1950 in Taiwan, Chiang Kai-shek still refered Guojun as the NRA [2]. Nobody today will mistake Guojun for the NRA, but does anyone know when the transition was made? Blueshirts ( talk) 22:54, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Guojun means National Army. So NRA and ROC armed forces refer to the same thing, the national army. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blastjet ( talk • contribs) 02:21, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
We are having problems of trying to determine whether to keep the "Western" or "German" description when comparing the competence of NRA's Foreign-trained elite divisions. So, this discussion is to discuss the disagreement. I have tried to retain the "Western" comparison because of it's broad range including the Germans. Liu Tao ( talk) 05:40, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
http://chinesemartialstudies.com/2012/11/26/693/
http://www.chineselongsword.com/dadao.shtml
http://thomaschen.freewebspace .com/photo5.html
http://thomaschen.freewebspace .com/photo6.html
http://lezaiqizhong.net/Lihua%20Webpages/ShangshanXiaxiang.htm
http://listverse.com/2013/02/23/10-terrible-things-done-to-pows/
http://edition.cnn.com/WORLD/9609/23/rare.photos/index.html
07:45, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on National Revolutionary Army. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:16, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
I have recently added a section to the Nanjing decade page for military developments in this period they could also be added here but this would require major article restructuring I think which is not my forte. The article in general requires restructuring too. Hurera123 ( talk) 20:13, 1 September 2023 (UTC)