This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
List here lost properties that have been confirmed from a published source. These should be reported to the Minnesota Historical Society for delisting.
References
List here properties which seem to be lost, but lack a citation confirming that they've been demolished.
Besides the three sections above, these are the only properties whose coordinates I am less than 99% sure of. In 2012 and 2013 I fine-tuned the coordinates for every MN NRHP listing to be spot-on. These remaining properties are probably correct but have resisted confirmation through aerial or street view imagery. - McGhiever ( talk) 17:13, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Use this section to list issues that don't fit in any other category.
Add to this section any properties that are difficult or impossible for regular contributors to photograph clearly. This will help other photographers know which sites are largely hopeless, while pinpointing which properties to request an image donation for from institutions like the Minnesota Historical Society.
These properties were delisted due to loss from demolition, fire, etc. They remain in need of a photograph, which could be solicited from a historical society or other institutional donation.
These properties were delisted because they were moved or altered, compromising their historical integrity. They may still be standing but their current locations are unknown. It may be useful to add their current coordinates and possibly a current photograph.
References
Some properties, particularly archaeological sites, are listed by the NRHP as "Address restricted" to protect them from looting or vandalism. There is a placeholder image used for these in county lists, but it may be possible to acquire specific images for some of these listings (for example, from a historical society or the Institute for Minnesota Archaeology, artifacts from the site now in a museum, or a historical marker). Moreover some sites are more publicly accessible than the NRHP listing suggests (marked with interpretive signage in a park, for example) and could be given coordinates and a site photo.
References
{{
cite document}}
: Unknown parameter |accessdate=
ignored (
help); Unknown parameter |url=
ignored (
help)
{{
cite document}}
: Unknown parameter |accessdate=
ignored (
help); Unknown parameter |url=
ignored (
help)
{{
cite document}}
: Unknown parameter |url=
ignored (
help)
I shifted the Willard Bunnell House link from Winona to Homer, because the house is actually in Homer, which borders Winona. I am gathering solid material now toward creating the Bunnell House article very soon. Hurrmic ( talk) 14:42, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Drafting at National Register of Historic Places listings in Minnesota\temp...if this turns out okay i would like to insert it into this list-article, as has been done for some other state RHP lists. This main list-article is a bit large, currently. If the remaining 20 or so small counties were table-ized, it would be too large. Is it okay if i move out to separate pages, some of the remaining larger counties? doncram ( talk) 23:42, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
I added section to list all Multiple Property Submission, MRA, and TR studies for NRHP eligibility for the state. Thanks Elkman for providing generator to make that list easily! Does this add to the list-article sufficiently to develop it? I personally think each of the MRA documents should justify an article.... doncram ( talk) 05:25, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Doncram added statement on where to find the entries for Minneapolis and Saint Paul. This should help many readers, especially those who don't know the state's largest city is in Hennepin County and the Capitol is in Ramsey. Another editor has removed it on the grounds of inconsistency. I think the benefit to the reader of being able to quickly find the Twin Cities in the long list outweighs inconsistency, particularly since so many listings are there. Jonathunder ( talk) 15:20, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Due to the slow page-loading for this list, built up by more photos being added all the time, i think it's necessary now to split out more of the counties. That is, to create separate articles for Aitkin 10, Dodge 10, Lac Qui Parle 10, Mower 10, Nobles 10, Waseca 10, Big Stone 9, and Isanti 9 counties. Hope that is okay. -- doncram ( talk) 19:55, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
Are they counties without any places listed not yet researched, or do they just not have any historic places in them? Sarah.Angela97 ( talk) 22:23, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
These properties were proposed to be removed from the National Register by the State Historic Preservation Review Board when they met in August 2018:
These are listed on the agenda for the November meeting:
- Jonathunder ( talk) 17:14, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi User:Jonathunder, others, does anyone have means to identify works by architect Lorenzo M. Boardman in the Minneapolis area? He apparently worked in the area for 30 years. An editor is keen to know. I tried browsing in the sources in historic district articles in Minneapolis, but many of those sources are not available online. -- Doncram ( talk) 21:21, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Is this the kind of research that determines every site in the National Register? I came across this assessment (p. 309) by accident. I've never heard of Mead & Hunt before (they have 40 US locations and wrote other works cited in Wikipedia) but am taken aback by their sources and conclusion. I guess they talked to or read Patty Dean (MNHS) and Chris Osgood, and they cite Wikipedia at least twice. That's an unacceptable gut punch of a record. Why didn't Mead & Hunt ask Martin Keller? Andrea Swensson? Jon Bream? Chris Riemenschneider? Sorry but I had assumed that the register used reliable sourcing that is better than Wikipedia's sources.
There is a dearth of scholarly research on the popular music scene in Minneapolis, and in the United
States in general. Without the perspective gained from this research, it is not possible to establish the
significance of First Avenue and the 7th Street Entry.
Recommendation:
First Avenue and the 7th St. Entry is recommended as not eligible for listing in the National Register.
- SusanLesch ( talk) 18:54, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
List here lost properties that have been confirmed from a published source. These should be reported to the Minnesota Historical Society for delisting.
References
List here properties which seem to be lost, but lack a citation confirming that they've been demolished.
Besides the three sections above, these are the only properties whose coordinates I am less than 99% sure of. In 2012 and 2013 I fine-tuned the coordinates for every MN NRHP listing to be spot-on. These remaining properties are probably correct but have resisted confirmation through aerial or street view imagery. - McGhiever ( talk) 17:13, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Use this section to list issues that don't fit in any other category.
Add to this section any properties that are difficult or impossible for regular contributors to photograph clearly. This will help other photographers know which sites are largely hopeless, while pinpointing which properties to request an image donation for from institutions like the Minnesota Historical Society.
These properties were delisted due to loss from demolition, fire, etc. They remain in need of a photograph, which could be solicited from a historical society or other institutional donation.
These properties were delisted because they were moved or altered, compromising their historical integrity. They may still be standing but their current locations are unknown. It may be useful to add their current coordinates and possibly a current photograph.
References
Some properties, particularly archaeological sites, are listed by the NRHP as "Address restricted" to protect them from looting or vandalism. There is a placeholder image used for these in county lists, but it may be possible to acquire specific images for some of these listings (for example, from a historical society or the Institute for Minnesota Archaeology, artifacts from the site now in a museum, or a historical marker). Moreover some sites are more publicly accessible than the NRHP listing suggests (marked with interpretive signage in a park, for example) and could be given coordinates and a site photo.
References
{{
cite document}}
: Unknown parameter |accessdate=
ignored (
help); Unknown parameter |url=
ignored (
help)
{{
cite document}}
: Unknown parameter |accessdate=
ignored (
help); Unknown parameter |url=
ignored (
help)
{{
cite document}}
: Unknown parameter |url=
ignored (
help)
I shifted the Willard Bunnell House link from Winona to Homer, because the house is actually in Homer, which borders Winona. I am gathering solid material now toward creating the Bunnell House article very soon. Hurrmic ( talk) 14:42, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Drafting at National Register of Historic Places listings in Minnesota\temp...if this turns out okay i would like to insert it into this list-article, as has been done for some other state RHP lists. This main list-article is a bit large, currently. If the remaining 20 or so small counties were table-ized, it would be too large. Is it okay if i move out to separate pages, some of the remaining larger counties? doncram ( talk) 23:42, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
I added section to list all Multiple Property Submission, MRA, and TR studies for NRHP eligibility for the state. Thanks Elkman for providing generator to make that list easily! Does this add to the list-article sufficiently to develop it? I personally think each of the MRA documents should justify an article.... doncram ( talk) 05:25, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Doncram added statement on where to find the entries for Minneapolis and Saint Paul. This should help many readers, especially those who don't know the state's largest city is in Hennepin County and the Capitol is in Ramsey. Another editor has removed it on the grounds of inconsistency. I think the benefit to the reader of being able to quickly find the Twin Cities in the long list outweighs inconsistency, particularly since so many listings are there. Jonathunder ( talk) 15:20, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Due to the slow page-loading for this list, built up by more photos being added all the time, i think it's necessary now to split out more of the counties. That is, to create separate articles for Aitkin 10, Dodge 10, Lac Qui Parle 10, Mower 10, Nobles 10, Waseca 10, Big Stone 9, and Isanti 9 counties. Hope that is okay. -- doncram ( talk) 19:55, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
Are they counties without any places listed not yet researched, or do they just not have any historic places in them? Sarah.Angela97 ( talk) 22:23, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
These properties were proposed to be removed from the National Register by the State Historic Preservation Review Board when they met in August 2018:
These are listed on the agenda for the November meeting:
- Jonathunder ( talk) 17:14, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi User:Jonathunder, others, does anyone have means to identify works by architect Lorenzo M. Boardman in the Minneapolis area? He apparently worked in the area for 30 years. An editor is keen to know. I tried browsing in the sources in historic district articles in Minneapolis, but many of those sources are not available online. -- Doncram ( talk) 21:21, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Is this the kind of research that determines every site in the National Register? I came across this assessment (p. 309) by accident. I've never heard of Mead & Hunt before (they have 40 US locations and wrote other works cited in Wikipedia) but am taken aback by their sources and conclusion. I guess they talked to or read Patty Dean (MNHS) and Chris Osgood, and they cite Wikipedia at least twice. That's an unacceptable gut punch of a record. Why didn't Mead & Hunt ask Martin Keller? Andrea Swensson? Jon Bream? Chris Riemenschneider? Sorry but I had assumed that the register used reliable sourcing that is better than Wikipedia's sources.
There is a dearth of scholarly research on the popular music scene in Minneapolis, and in the United
States in general. Without the perspective gained from this research, it is not possible to establish the
significance of First Avenue and the 7th Street Entry.
Recommendation:
First Avenue and the 7th St. Entry is recommended as not eligible for listing in the National Register.
- SusanLesch ( talk) 18:54, 25 April 2023 (UTC)