This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The information on Alberta in the Implementation section is far more detailed than for any other province. Should it have its own subsection?-- Jrsnbarn ( talk) 15:37, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
The provincial code "implementations" section is very flawed. There is nothing special about Alberta or Ontario versus the other provinces that have created their own codes based on the provincial model. I will come back when I have some more time to properly update all of the provincial/municipal codes information. Right now I will do a light edit to correct some of the glaring errors, but I'll clean it all up a bit later. Webgeer ( talk) 00:36, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
What about New-Brunswick? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.118.116.102 ( talk) 17:47, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
How about http://www.gnb.ca/legis/bill/FILE/56/3/Bill-75-e.htm Extremo88 ( talk) 18:47, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
British Columbia has its own provincial building code in addition to Vancouver's Building Bylaw; Implementation section should be updated to reflect this. Spiegalr ( talk) 17:37, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
"... In a few cases, municipalities have been given the historic right of writing their own building code ...". It implies that there is something "historic" (i.e.: distinctly memorable) about such a right. I suspect what the author of this sentence meant was that municipalities have historically been given the right. But I don't know enough about the topic to correct it on my own. Terry Thorgaard ( talk) 16:45, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
National Building Code of Canada. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 08:17, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The information on Alberta in the Implementation section is far more detailed than for any other province. Should it have its own subsection?-- Jrsnbarn ( talk) 15:37, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
The provincial code "implementations" section is very flawed. There is nothing special about Alberta or Ontario versus the other provinces that have created their own codes based on the provincial model. I will come back when I have some more time to properly update all of the provincial/municipal codes information. Right now I will do a light edit to correct some of the glaring errors, but I'll clean it all up a bit later. Webgeer ( talk) 00:36, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
What about New-Brunswick? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.118.116.102 ( talk) 17:47, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
How about http://www.gnb.ca/legis/bill/FILE/56/3/Bill-75-e.htm Extremo88 ( talk) 18:47, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
British Columbia has its own provincial building code in addition to Vancouver's Building Bylaw; Implementation section should be updated to reflect this. Spiegalr ( talk) 17:37, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
"... In a few cases, municipalities have been given the historic right of writing their own building code ...". It implies that there is something "historic" (i.e.: distinctly memorable) about such a right. I suspect what the author of this sentence meant was that municipalities have historically been given the right. But I don't know enough about the topic to correct it on my own. Terry Thorgaard ( talk) 16:45, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
National Building Code of Canada. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 08:17, 9 January 2016 (UTC)