![]() | Nathan C. Brooks has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have reviewed this article according to the requirements of the GA criteria and have put the article on hold at this time until the following issues are addressed:
The article looks fine overall, and these above issues should be very easy to fix for this brief article. I will leave the article on hold for seven days for the above issues to be addressed. If you have any questions about the review or when you are done, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. -- Nehrams2020 ( talk) 00:53, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
First off, thank you for the review. Below are my responses to your concerns.
Thanks again for the review. Let me know if there are any additional concerns or other ways to improve the article. Golem88991 ( talk) 07:54, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Good work on addressing the above issues so quickly. I have passed the article as a GA based on the GA criteria. Continue to improve the article and make sure that all new information is properly sourced. To anyone that is reading this review, please consider reviewing an article or two at WP:GAN to help with the large backlog. Instructions can be found here. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Again, good work on the article, and I hope you continue to improve articles on Wikipedia. Happy editing! -- Nehrams2020 ( talk) 08:29, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Nathan C. Brooks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:05, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
![]() | Nathan C. Brooks has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have reviewed this article according to the requirements of the GA criteria and have put the article on hold at this time until the following issues are addressed:
The article looks fine overall, and these above issues should be very easy to fix for this brief article. I will leave the article on hold for seven days for the above issues to be addressed. If you have any questions about the review or when you are done, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. -- Nehrams2020 ( talk) 00:53, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
First off, thank you for the review. Below are my responses to your concerns.
Thanks again for the review. Let me know if there are any additional concerns or other ways to improve the article. Golem88991 ( talk) 07:54, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Good work on addressing the above issues so quickly. I have passed the article as a GA based on the GA criteria. Continue to improve the article and make sure that all new information is properly sourced. To anyone that is reading this review, please consider reviewing an article or two at WP:GAN to help with the large backlog. Instructions can be found here. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Again, good work on the article, and I hope you continue to improve articles on Wikipedia. Happy editing! -- Nehrams2020 ( talk) 08:29, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Nathan C. Brooks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:05, 13 February 2018 (UTC)