GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Fredlyfish4 ( talk · contribs) 18:34, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Infobox
Done IUCN lists 5 species. OK I will remove and apply to all species pages listed--
Michael Goodyear (
talk)
19:34, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Lead
Done changed and linked to ancient civilisation since I cannot see a way to link to a list of names, and adding names to text would lengthen the lead further--
Michael Goodyear (
talk)
19:34, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Done linked to Asphodelus as in text --
Michael Goodyear (
talk)
19:34, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Done
Done shortened and reduced from 5 paragraphs to 4 --
Michael Goodyear (
talk)
19:57, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Description
Done let's stick with hermaphroditic which is in the source cited --
Michael Goodyear (
talk)
20:03, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Taxonomy
Done could have been worded better - the International Register is the RHS list - reworded and updated --
Michael Goodyear (
talk)
20:33, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Done The terms are used as defined by Zonneveld, hence the quotes, to refer to stages in the evolution of speciation. So recent with respect to ancient, ie not yet established as an independent species. Reworded.--
Michael Goodyear (
talk)
20:47, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Ecology
Done In plant pathology, the term is generally used with reference to economic impact. Reworded - replaced important with serious --
Michael Goodyear (
talk)
21:07, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Done I had that same thought when writing this section, but stuck with the naming convention, since the genus name is being used as an adjective, not a proper noun. --
Michael Goodyear (
talk)
21:10, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Done reworded --
Michael Goodyear (
talk)
21:21, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Cultivation
Done Well not entirely, where sources are using 'daffodil' I stuck with it. i changed one group - the early illustrations, but kept the other because that's what the text refers to. --
Michael Goodyear (
talk)
21:39, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Done It followed the citation - nevertheless I changed it to a {{quote}}--
Michael Goodyear (
talk)
21:43, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Done In this context, 'popular' implies sales data - reworded --
Michael Goodyear (
talk)
03:24, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Done references added --
Michael Goodyear (
talk)
05:40, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Images
Done Dates added to files
Other comments for potential FA review, but not needed for passing GA:
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Fredlyfish4 ( talk · contribs) 18:34, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Infobox
Done IUCN lists 5 species. OK I will remove and apply to all species pages listed--
Michael Goodyear (
talk)
19:34, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Lead
Done changed and linked to ancient civilisation since I cannot see a way to link to a list of names, and adding names to text would lengthen the lead further--
Michael Goodyear (
talk)
19:34, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Done linked to Asphodelus as in text --
Michael Goodyear (
talk)
19:34, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Done
Done shortened and reduced from 5 paragraphs to 4 --
Michael Goodyear (
talk)
19:57, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Description
Done let's stick with hermaphroditic which is in the source cited --
Michael Goodyear (
talk)
20:03, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Taxonomy
Done could have been worded better - the International Register is the RHS list - reworded and updated --
Michael Goodyear (
talk)
20:33, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Done The terms are used as defined by Zonneveld, hence the quotes, to refer to stages in the evolution of speciation. So recent with respect to ancient, ie not yet established as an independent species. Reworded.--
Michael Goodyear (
talk)
20:47, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Ecology
Done In plant pathology, the term is generally used with reference to economic impact. Reworded - replaced important with serious --
Michael Goodyear (
talk)
21:07, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Done I had that same thought when writing this section, but stuck with the naming convention, since the genus name is being used as an adjective, not a proper noun. --
Michael Goodyear (
talk)
21:10, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Done reworded --
Michael Goodyear (
talk)
21:21, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Cultivation
Done Well not entirely, where sources are using 'daffodil' I stuck with it. i changed one group - the early illustrations, but kept the other because that's what the text refers to. --
Michael Goodyear (
talk)
21:39, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Done It followed the citation - nevertheless I changed it to a {{quote}}--
Michael Goodyear (
talk)
21:43, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Done In this context, 'popular' implies sales data - reworded --
Michael Goodyear (
talk)
03:24, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Done references added --
Michael Goodyear (
talk)
05:40, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Images
Done Dates added to files
Other comments for potential FA review, but not needed for passing GA:
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria