This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles This article was accepted from this draft on 11 September 2021 by reviewer Nomadicghumakkad ( talk · contribs). India: Karnataka / Politics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Karnataka (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Low-importance). Biography: Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

While there is sufficient evidence that Raju Gowda meets Wikipedia's notability criteria as they apply to politicians, there are a great many facts in the article that are missing footnotes (inline citations). Inline citations are required for this type of article and it's particularly important that statements in the article (such as birth date) are attributable to a reliable, ideally secondary, source. — jmcgnh ^{(talk)  (contribs)} 12:40, 12 September 2021 (UTC) reply