This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Narada sting operation article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | Narada sting operation has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: December 17, 2018. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Narada Sting Operation was copied or moved into Narada sting operation with this edit on 13:46, 11 May 2017. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Narada sting operation appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 11 June 2017 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Anybody who know about this subject please add WIZRADICAL ( talk) 05:37, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Proposal:Merge Narada sting operation and Narada Sting Operation.The problems are that Narada sting Operation was almost singlehandedly created and reviewed by @ Winged Blades of Godric: whereas Narada sting operation was created by WIZRADICAL(me in a now inactive account) but has the involvement of certain other editors.I dare not do it myself as I will almost certainly have a bias towards my material.Also Narada sting operation has in my opinion a more developed talkpage(created almost entirely by other users) whereas the page Narada sting Operation does not have a maintenance template(which is there in Narada sting operation).Another problem is the naming conventions (Narada sting operation) is named according to the guidelines whereas Narada sting Operation is not.Pinging@ Northamerica1000:@ Magioladitis:@ Gtstricky:@ NewYorkActuary:@ Vycl1994: as I need this resolved fast(not Wikipedia:Canvassing asI have pinged people from both articles FORCE RADICAL ( talk) 09:42, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks fror resolving the issue. FORCE RADICAL ( talk) 11:39, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
It would be helpful to include the dates of the newspaper articles cited, not just the date that you accessed them. Yoninah ( talk) 15:19, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Just a couple of general points at the moment. First, the article is short, which is not necessarily a problem at the GA level but raises the question of whether it is truly comprehensive. In particular, I think a touch more background would help. Second, the sources all seem to be dealing primarily with single incidents related to the sting. It would be very helpful to obtain a few sources providing an overview: scholarly sources would be ideal. This would also allow the article to be structured more smoothly. Cheers, Vanamonde ( talk) 13:49, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Vami IV ( talk · contribs) 23:49, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
Disclaimers: I am not knowledgeable in Indian politics or its dialect in English. I understand the author is on an indefinite "semi-wikibreak," and will therefore be keeping this review On Hold until the nominator or another interested party responds to my comments..
In every review I conduct, make small copyedits. These will only be limited to spelling and punctuation (removal of double spaces and such). I will only make substantive edits that change the flow and structure of the prose if I previously suggested and it is necessary. For replying to Reviewer comment, please use Done,
Fixed,
Added,
Not done,
Doing..., or
Removed, followed by any comment you'd like to make. I will be crossing out my comments as they are redressed, and only mine.. –
♠Vami
_IV†♠
23:49, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
This is the comment that I shall leave standing for the time being: This article has an abundance of citations (81 at time of writing), but a comparatively negligible amount of prose for it to support. What has been constructed is a skeleton with no muscles. Expand the article, and I will review that. – ♠Vami _IV†♠ 23:49, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
Why is Matthew Samuel being referred to by his first name?
WP:SURNAME. –
♠Vami
_IV†♠
17:41, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Could you move the picture of Matthew Samuel up to this section? –
♠Vami
_IV†♠
17:49, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
IPS officerWhat's the IPS?
A certain partWhat part. This has no teeth without specifics.
a nearly two-year lag.Say when.
Whilst the state objected to the handling of the probe to CBI, a bench of the Court, presided by Chief Justice Nishita Mhatre subsequently held that whilst the motives of Samuel and the legality of his actions might be debatable, that does not undermine the findings of the sting, in any manner and an investigation by an impartial agency shall be proceeded with.Looooong.
3 lakh INRCould you link "lakh" and "Indian rupees" here?
Good Article review progress box
|
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Narada sting operation article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | Narada sting operation has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: December 17, 2018. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Narada Sting Operation was copied or moved into Narada sting operation with this edit on 13:46, 11 May 2017. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Narada sting operation appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 11 June 2017 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Anybody who know about this subject please add WIZRADICAL ( talk) 05:37, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Proposal:Merge Narada sting operation and Narada Sting Operation.The problems are that Narada sting Operation was almost singlehandedly created and reviewed by @ Winged Blades of Godric: whereas Narada sting operation was created by WIZRADICAL(me in a now inactive account) but has the involvement of certain other editors.I dare not do it myself as I will almost certainly have a bias towards my material.Also Narada sting operation has in my opinion a more developed talkpage(created almost entirely by other users) whereas the page Narada sting Operation does not have a maintenance template(which is there in Narada sting operation).Another problem is the naming conventions (Narada sting operation) is named according to the guidelines whereas Narada sting Operation is not.Pinging@ Northamerica1000:@ Magioladitis:@ Gtstricky:@ NewYorkActuary:@ Vycl1994: as I need this resolved fast(not Wikipedia:Canvassing asI have pinged people from both articles FORCE RADICAL ( talk) 09:42, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks fror resolving the issue. FORCE RADICAL ( talk) 11:39, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
It would be helpful to include the dates of the newspaper articles cited, not just the date that you accessed them. Yoninah ( talk) 15:19, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Just a couple of general points at the moment. First, the article is short, which is not necessarily a problem at the GA level but raises the question of whether it is truly comprehensive. In particular, I think a touch more background would help. Second, the sources all seem to be dealing primarily with single incidents related to the sting. It would be very helpful to obtain a few sources providing an overview: scholarly sources would be ideal. This would also allow the article to be structured more smoothly. Cheers, Vanamonde ( talk) 13:49, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Vami IV ( talk · contribs) 23:49, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
Disclaimers: I am not knowledgeable in Indian politics or its dialect in English. I understand the author is on an indefinite "semi-wikibreak," and will therefore be keeping this review On Hold until the nominator or another interested party responds to my comments..
In every review I conduct, make small copyedits. These will only be limited to spelling and punctuation (removal of double spaces and such). I will only make substantive edits that change the flow and structure of the prose if I previously suggested and it is necessary. For replying to Reviewer comment, please use Done,
Fixed,
Added,
Not done,
Doing..., or
Removed, followed by any comment you'd like to make. I will be crossing out my comments as they are redressed, and only mine.. –
♠Vami
_IV†♠
23:49, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
This is the comment that I shall leave standing for the time being: This article has an abundance of citations (81 at time of writing), but a comparatively negligible amount of prose for it to support. What has been constructed is a skeleton with no muscles. Expand the article, and I will review that. – ♠Vami _IV†♠ 23:49, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
Why is Matthew Samuel being referred to by his first name?
WP:SURNAME. –
♠Vami
_IV†♠
17:41, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Could you move the picture of Matthew Samuel up to this section? –
♠Vami
_IV†♠
17:49, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
IPS officerWhat's the IPS?
A certain partWhat part. This has no teeth without specifics.
a nearly two-year lag.Say when.
Whilst the state objected to the handling of the probe to CBI, a bench of the Court, presided by Chief Justice Nishita Mhatre subsequently held that whilst the motives of Samuel and the legality of his actions might be debatable, that does not undermine the findings of the sting, in any manner and an investigation by an impartial agency shall be proceeded with.Looooong.
3 lakh INRCould you link "lakh" and "Indian rupees" here?
Good Article review progress box
|