I do not believe that this article was ready to be nominated. Rather than failing it outright, I will allow for one week to make the initial improvements to the article. If these are completed, I will continue with a more complete review. For now:
This would be a good start and would put the article within striking distance of GA. I will keep the article on my watchlist and check back to see if progress is being made. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan ( talk) 21:46, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
This article has had some substantial improvements over the past week, and the quality of the article is much better. I still have serious concerns about the lack of references. Because it has been 8 days and large sections of the article are still unreferenced, I am going to fail this GA nomination. The article has great potential, so I urge you to keep working on it and renominate it once the remaining concerns are addressed. Aside from more thorough referencing:
Like I said, it's a good article, but it's not ready to be promoted to GA status yet. A peer review might help find some other things, but this list would be a great start. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan ( talk) 14:55, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
I do not believe that this article was ready to be nominated. Rather than failing it outright, I will allow for one week to make the initial improvements to the article. If these are completed, I will continue with a more complete review. For now:
This would be a good start and would put the article within striking distance of GA. I will keep the article on my watchlist and check back to see if progress is being made. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan ( talk) 21:46, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
This article has had some substantial improvements over the past week, and the quality of the article is much better. I still have serious concerns about the lack of references. Because it has been 8 days and large sections of the article are still unreferenced, I am going to fail this GA nomination. The article has great potential, so I urge you to keep working on it and renominate it once the remaining concerns are addressed. Aside from more thorough referencing:
Like I said, it's a good article, but it's not ready to be promoted to GA status yet. A peer review might help find some other things, but this list would be a great start. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan ( talk) 14:55, 5 June 2008 (UTC)