This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Greece Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Mythology Low‑importance This redirect is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Was Eurydice whom Orpheus loved, one of the Napaeae? L Hamm 01:21, 7 March 2006 (UTC) reply

Bogus category: "Nymphs haunting forests, groves, and glens." is all Harry Thurston Peck had to say. An invention in Nonnus, Dionysiaca? A Renaissance invention? Essentially a poetical ludibrium of listmakers, not a real feature of the Greek or Roman imagination. Yes?-- Wetman 21:45, 23 May 2007 (UTC) reply

I checked the ever-reliable The Theoi Project and Napaeae only shows up on one page: in the section on early divisions by authors before the accepted divisions were created in folklore, and in the dictionary box (sorry, I can't remember the author/book). The only other source I recall that mentions Napaeae is Pierre DuBois's The Great Encyclopaedia of Faeries, and that's not much of a source, as most fairy descriptions in that book come from French Romanticist authors. 24.14.198.8 05:27, 22 June 2007 (UTC) Chris G. reply

There are no individual (named) Napaeae? CapnZapp ( talk) 08:56, 13 November 2019 (UTC) reply