This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
See also Namsos for history of edits for this article.
Far too much glowing text about this place. Rick K 23:57, Jan 28, 2005 (UTC)
I see very little text about Namsos proper. The town itself became well known in April/May 1940 because it was almost totally destroyed by air. Perhaps its notoriety was brief, but for a while it was one with Guernica and Rotterdam. It was known in Norway for being picturesque. It is important to say this for the same reason it is important to point out the beauty of Dresden, and the loss when it was bombed.
The article is also important for illustrating the unreadiness of the Allied forces, the need for air cover in military and naval operations ( the Poles knew this but the Britisha nd French were slower to appreciate it) and generally, the more professional quality of the Germans. I have underrepresented thier viewpoint as well as the Norweigan because I don"t speak those languages. Did check some Norweigan and French sources in translation. But, this is a work in progress. Polycarp
Really, does anyone know Getz's whole name?
"Steel was far more important in 1939 than today, as plastics and composite materials were little used." This statement is so inaccurate as to be false. Other than aircraft, which in that time were made of aluminum and wood, virtually no modern vehicles or weapons are made out of composites. Steel and the Iron ore necessary to make it is still the number one strategic metal by far. 71.63.88.111 ( talk) 06:49, 6 September 2008 (UTC)please rephrase
Because my grand father was involved in the Namsos combat in the French Army, I have find in my books this one that deals about the Namsos combat.
{{
cite book}}
: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (
link)This autors mades also : "13 jours à Namsos"
Re changes in title made by Manxruler. While I'll let your change stand to avoid a quarrell, it is a much poorer title. It is not at all clear what it means, the phrasing is ungainly and the original is definitely not silly. "Getting cold feet" is a prefectly acceptable phrase and conveys what actually happened. If you doubt that, read Churchill's acount. Polycarp. We must all try not to use vitriolic language in describing the work of others.
Steel----Vehicles are very important to moving an army. Very little is used in motor vehicles anymore, as compared to the 1940s. I'm old enough to remember. And a whole host of regular day to day materials which were made of steel in 1940, are made of plastic today---outdoor dishes? Polycarp
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
See also Namsos for history of edits for this article.
Far too much glowing text about this place. Rick K 23:57, Jan 28, 2005 (UTC)
I see very little text about Namsos proper. The town itself became well known in April/May 1940 because it was almost totally destroyed by air. Perhaps its notoriety was brief, but for a while it was one with Guernica and Rotterdam. It was known in Norway for being picturesque. It is important to say this for the same reason it is important to point out the beauty of Dresden, and the loss when it was bombed.
The article is also important for illustrating the unreadiness of the Allied forces, the need for air cover in military and naval operations ( the Poles knew this but the Britisha nd French were slower to appreciate it) and generally, the more professional quality of the Germans. I have underrepresented thier viewpoint as well as the Norweigan because I don"t speak those languages. Did check some Norweigan and French sources in translation. But, this is a work in progress. Polycarp
Really, does anyone know Getz's whole name?
"Steel was far more important in 1939 than today, as plastics and composite materials were little used." This statement is so inaccurate as to be false. Other than aircraft, which in that time were made of aluminum and wood, virtually no modern vehicles or weapons are made out of composites. Steel and the Iron ore necessary to make it is still the number one strategic metal by far. 71.63.88.111 ( talk) 06:49, 6 September 2008 (UTC)please rephrase
Because my grand father was involved in the Namsos combat in the French Army, I have find in my books this one that deals about the Namsos combat.
{{
cite book}}
: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (
link)This autors mades also : "13 jours à Namsos"
Re changes in title made by Manxruler. While I'll let your change stand to avoid a quarrell, it is a much poorer title. It is not at all clear what it means, the phrasing is ungainly and the original is definitely not silly. "Getting cold feet" is a prefectly acceptable phrase and conveys what actually happened. If you doubt that, read Churchill's acount. Polycarp. We must all try not to use vitriolic language in describing the work of others.
Steel----Vehicles are very important to moving an army. Very little is used in motor vehicles anymore, as compared to the 1940s. I'm old enough to remember. And a whole host of regular day to day materials which were made of steel in 1940, are made of plastic today---outdoor dishes? Polycarp