![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why no mention of French Indochina, the Japanese takeover of WWII, or the Vietnam War? 68.37.254.48 ( talk) 15:15, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Nam tiến. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:47, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
I'm Vietnamese I can talk "Han" phrase in this article is wrong. "Han" is not individual phrase about Chinese, more than it's not about Han dynasty. All three, Chinese, Vietnamese, Korea used "Han" phrase with meant cultural, cultural people, civilized or civilized people. That's word opposite meant with barbarians. Vietnamese meant they civilized more than their neighbor: Chams, Laos, Khmer, Thai. The same, Korean call their nation is De Han Min Kuk (대한민국), "Han" not about Chinese anyway, like Vietnamese "Han" phrase just meant civilized. although, all that from an origin word. Đông Minh ( talk) 05:31, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why no mention of French Indochina, the Japanese takeover of WWII, or the Vietnam War? 68.37.254.48 ( talk) 15:15, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Nam tiến. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:47, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
I'm Vietnamese I can talk "Han" phrase in this article is wrong. "Han" is not individual phrase about Chinese, more than it's not about Han dynasty. All three, Chinese, Vietnamese, Korea used "Han" phrase with meant cultural, cultural people, civilized or civilized people. That's word opposite meant with barbarians. Vietnamese meant they civilized more than their neighbor: Chams, Laos, Khmer, Thai. The same, Korean call their nation is De Han Min Kuk (대한민국), "Han" not about Chinese anyway, like Vietnamese "Han" phrase just meant civilized. although, all that from an origin word. Đông Minh ( talk) 05:31, 5 October 2018 (UTC)