This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article contains a translation of Nakota from it.wikipedia. Inserted a very brief reference to the article Sioux language |
It is requested that an image or photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Following a long debate on the discussione page [1] of the article Sioux language, since I had found another article (or an article’s title) Nakota which was nothing else but a wrong redirection to Sioux, I created the article itself translating the contents of the corresponding Italian one ( it:Nakota), and inserted just a very brief reference to it and to the matter of the Yankton-Yanktonai misnomer in the aforesaid article Sioux language.
As the new article shows disagreeable traces of its Italian origins, apart from the want of a general grammar, style, and spelling copy-editing, and save for anybody’s chance to modify it as one likes, I think it would be necessary that some willing one would:
1. substitute at least an English language source for the Italian work I have cited in the note no. 3 as an example of support for the traditional wrong partition of the Sioux nation;
2. add at least an English language source to the note no. 4 (besides Ella Deloria), as an example of previous objections to the same traditional partition.
Thank-you very much.-- Jeanambr ( talk) 13:13, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
I've worked on sections up to "Present Trends", to make more concise and clear, and consistent with good English. Will continue to work on this.-- Parkwells ( talk) 20:23, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Nakota. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:12, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Nakota. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:55, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
In Canada, Nakota refers to Dakota people ( https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/assiniboine) and to the Assiniboine ( https://teaching.usask.ca/indigenoussk/import/nakota_assiniboine.php). Should this article just refer readers to those two articles? Acadiana-23 ( talk) 17:17, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article contains a translation of Nakota from it.wikipedia. Inserted a very brief reference to the article Sioux language |
It is requested that an image or photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Following a long debate on the discussione page [1] of the article Sioux language, since I had found another article (or an article’s title) Nakota which was nothing else but a wrong redirection to Sioux, I created the article itself translating the contents of the corresponding Italian one ( it:Nakota), and inserted just a very brief reference to it and to the matter of the Yankton-Yanktonai misnomer in the aforesaid article Sioux language.
As the new article shows disagreeable traces of its Italian origins, apart from the want of a general grammar, style, and spelling copy-editing, and save for anybody’s chance to modify it as one likes, I think it would be necessary that some willing one would:
1. substitute at least an English language source for the Italian work I have cited in the note no. 3 as an example of support for the traditional wrong partition of the Sioux nation;
2. add at least an English language source to the note no. 4 (besides Ella Deloria), as an example of previous objections to the same traditional partition.
Thank-you very much.-- Jeanambr ( talk) 13:13, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
I've worked on sections up to "Present Trends", to make more concise and clear, and consistent with good English. Will continue to work on this.-- Parkwells ( talk) 20:23, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Nakota. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:12, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Nakota. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:55, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
In Canada, Nakota refers to Dakota people ( https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/assiniboine) and to the Assiniboine ( https://teaching.usask.ca/indigenoussk/import/nakota_assiniboine.php). Should this article just refer readers to those two articles? Acadiana-23 ( talk) 17:17, 24 May 2024 (UTC)