This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
* Root: pkg install root-repo
* Unstable: pkg install unstable-repo * X11: pkg install x11-repo
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Naja nigricincta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:52, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
There have been multiple additions and reversions regarding the inclusion of a non-native population of Naja nigricincta in parts of the United States. The inclusions are perhaps by one person using multiple IPs, so it's hard to discuss directly via user talk pages with the anonymous editors. Therefore I have started this discussion thread.
From what I can see in the revision history for this article, there may be one or more non-native (perhaps an escaped pet or breeding pair) of Naja nigricincta in parts of the US, specifically North Carolina.
I'd like to ask fellow registered editors who have reverted, such as @ C.Fred: and @ DanCherek: if there is any merit in including a new section for non-native populations, if the population can be verified by reliable sources?
If not, should we ask for this page to be protected in some fashion to prevent any further disruptive edits?
Let's try and reach a consensus and attempt to put this issue to bed without the risk of starting an edit war.
Thank you Textualism ( talk) 08:38, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
* Root: pkg install root-repo
* Unstable: pkg install unstable-repo * X11: pkg install x11-repo
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Naja nigricincta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:52, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
There have been multiple additions and reversions regarding the inclusion of a non-native population of Naja nigricincta in parts of the United States. The inclusions are perhaps by one person using multiple IPs, so it's hard to discuss directly via user talk pages with the anonymous editors. Therefore I have started this discussion thread.
From what I can see in the revision history for this article, there may be one or more non-native (perhaps an escaped pet or breeding pair) of Naja nigricincta in parts of the US, specifically North Carolina.
I'd like to ask fellow registered editors who have reverted, such as @ C.Fred: and @ DanCherek: if there is any merit in including a new section for non-native populations, if the population can be verified by reliable sources?
If not, should we ask for this page to be protected in some fashion to prevent any further disruptive edits?
Let's try and reach a consensus and attempt to put this issue to bed without the risk of starting an edit war.
Thank you Textualism ( talk) 08:38, 1 July 2021 (UTC)